Another year passes with no single-use plastic ban
(CNS): It is now three years since the PPM-led government created a steering committee in July 2019 to shape a policy to ban some single-use plastics in the Cayman Islands, such as plastic bags, straws and take-out food containers. CNS contacted the Ministry of Sustainability this week about the status of the proposed ban but our inquiries have been ignored, despite a commitment by the PACT administration to roll out a ban by the end of the third quarter of this year — just two months away.
The government initially targeted January 2021 as the date to introduce the ban, but the steering committee has not met since the arrival of COVID-19 closed down its work in early 2020 after just a few meetings in 2019. The pandemic has since provided an excuse for what appears to be a complete lack of action relating to a potential ban.
Nevertheless, Premier Wayne Panton announced earlier this year that he intended to roll out a ban on certain single-use plastic products by October 2022.
“What I have indicated to my team is that I want to have single-use plastic bans in place in the third quarter. That is the target we have,” Panton said in May. “We’ve got to change the way we do things. We can’t just go for convenience to get things done. We got to go and do things deliberately and recognise that we have a planet and an environment and an ecosystem to respect and protect because it enables us to survive.”
The comments were made on Discovery Day shortly after the historic swim by Oly Rush, who became the first person to swim all around Grand Cayman to raise money for Plastic Free Cayman (PFC), which advocates for a local plastic ban. Following that event, Claire Hughes, the founder of PFC and a member of the steering committee, confirmed that the members had not met since before the pandemic and none of them had heard from the current government about getting the plans for a ban back on track.
As PFC continues to call on the government to implement the ban, the non-profit group organises beach clean-ups month after month. So far this year, volunteers have cleared more than 5,000lbs from the coastline.
- Fascinated
- Happy
- Sad
- Angry
- Bored
- Afraid
Category: Environmental Health, Health
You realise all of the plastic floating up on our beaches comes from Haiti and Jamaica right?
Not sure what banning plastic is supposed to achieve.
I never cease to be entertained by the hype and ignorance surrounding the plastic versus paper “green” mythology and the ignorance of those purveyors of hysterics bent on replacing one environmental disaster with another.
Do some thoughtful research in regard to how myriad environmental studies–done and published by credible researchers, universities, environmental groups and
laboratories–weight in on the environmental impacts of plastic vs paper.
In the realm of environmental impacts in regard to straws, bags, single-use cups, most consumer packaging, paper rates poorly vs its plastic counterpart.
If you do a careful analysis in regard to the following impacts you will see that the mindless activists are more than a tad bit benighted in their delight to embrace paper over plastic in all cases and scenarios.
Take a look at plastic vs paper in regard to:
–Total fossil fuel consumption in the raw material supply stage.
–Total fossil fuel consumed in manufacturing.
–Total energy used in manufacturing/transport.
–Total carbon footprint impact throughout the raw material gathering/manufacturing/transport/use/disposal/recycling cycle or “total cycle”.
–Amount of water used in the total cycle of the respective products.
–Quantity of greenhouse gasses emitted in the total cycle of the products.
–Landfill impacts.
–Energy and fossil fuels used in transporting the respective products throughout their total cycle.
–Energy and carbon cost of recycling.
–Impact on carbon-sequestering trees/forests.
–Promotion of atmospheric acidification and the eutrophication of inland and ocean bodies of water.
–Persistence in the environment at end-of-life and as litter.
This may come as really big surprise to many here (and I am certain that Panton is blissfully unaware) but in all but the latter metric, properly selected and utilised plastic generally has less negative environmental impact compared to its paper counterpart! In some metrics, plastic exerts far less negative environmental impact than paper. Bioplastic greatly alleviates the last issue, which is persistence in the terrestrial and marine environment.
As far as bags and straws are concerned it is not even close. In all but environmental persistence, plastic wins the environmental Green Prize over paper. (Are you listening Wayne??)
Thus, in mindlessly, thoughtlessly, ignorantly, buying into the “Green” propaganda against plastic, we are in danger of being led by our blissfully ignorant leaders to trade one problem for another even worse problem.
Do not be sheeple! Dig deep for Truth!
And the truth is: Did Anonymous really write this? Is he or her on Mr. Dart’s payroll? I would say, “Probably”, but it really doesn’t matter, does it? Hey, Mr. Anonymous, I tip my hat to you…… That is a good write-up for Mr. Dart”s horrible styrofotam and other unnecessary crap that is ruining our earth so Mr. Dart can add to his fortune. The last information on his wealth was that he is now a billionaire. I wonder how much money do you need before you decide that you have enough to continue living and stop ruining everything for humanity….?
t
@7:37:
Typical benighted one who attacks the messenger because they lack the intellectual and factual resources to refute the message. Big fail. Try again.
Here, this should keep you busy for a few years:
Science speaks to your ignorance.
Every credible scientific study undertaken shows that, compared to paper bags, conventional plastic shopping bags impose less negative impacts nearly across the board relating to metrics commonly used to assess a product’s effect on the environment.
I shall introduce you to a few independent assessments of plastic shopping bags and their impact on the environment conducted by advanced governments.
There are many, many, many, more than these; but to keep it simple and not overwhelm your little mind. Look them up and read them.
These, and indeed most, scientific studies are in total harmony in their conclusion that plastic shopping bags, based on how they are used by consumers, are the least impactful on the environment. All credible Life Cycle Assessments (LCA’s) clearly demonstrate that a ban on plastic shopping bags will actually harm the environment. The most prudent course is to heavily promote multiple-use plastic bags.
It is interesting to note that even the many jurisdictions that want to curb use of the common thin white HDPE bags, come right back to plastic as being the best choice for reusable bags!
(Note: I purposely omitted giving the links to the references as I feel it will do you good to do your own research rather than be spoon-fed.)
1. The Quebec Government LCA found that: “No replacement option has an environmental advantage in the event of a ban on plastic shopping bags.”
The most interesting study finding is that the conventional, thin plastic shopping bag is not a single-use bag because it has a very high reuse rate at 77%. Related to paper bags, they stated: “The paper bag is the least performing bag with 4 to 28 times greater potential impacts than the conventional plastic bag.”
2. The Government of Denmark LCA found that paper bags would have to be reused up to 43 times considering all other indicators, in order to equal the comparatively low environmental impact of plastic. This study is a real eye-opener. Source: “Life Cycle Assessment of grocery carrier bags – Miljøstyrelsen”
Be sure to scroll down to the part in English as the introduction is in Danish.
3. The UK Environment Agency
From: “Life cycle assessment of supermarket carrier
bags”
Report #: SC030148
Excerpt:
Impact categories of High Density Polyethylene (HDPE)
bags like the typical thin white grocery bag.
The results of the study over 8 indicators
>1 equals worse impact than HDPE bag
<1 equals less impact than HDPE bag)
1. Consumption of non- renewable energy
HDPE: 1
Paper: 1.1
2. Consumption of water
HDPE: 1
Paper: 4
3. Emission of greenhouse gases
HDPE: 1
Paper: 3.3
4. Atmospheric acidification
HDPE: 1
Paper: 1.9
5. Formation of photochemical oxidants
HDPE: 1
Paper: 1.3
6. Eutrophication of water
HDPE: 1
Paper: 14
7. Production of solid waste
HDPE: 1
Paper: 2.7
8. Risk of littering
HDPE: High
Paper: Low
Note that in all metrics other than littering risk, paper had greater negative impact on the environment compared to plastic.
The UK Life Cycle Assessment also found that conventional plastic shopping bag (HDPE) outperformed all alternatives, even reusables, on environmental performance. They have a much lower global warming potential. Paper bags would have to be used three times to lower their global warming potential to match that of a conventional HDPE plastic shopping bag being used just once.
4. "Life cycle assessment of plastic grocery bags and their alternatives in cities with confined waste management structure: A Singapore case study"
The assessment concludes:
In the case of Singapore, usage of reusable plastic bags followed by HDPE plastic bags are the recommended options. Switching to paper or cloth bags would increase the environmental footprint resulting in heightened negative effects such as global warming and eco-toxicity potentials. It is advised to opt for reusable plastic bags that can be reused multiple times. Otherwise, single use HDPE bags are recommended over kraft paper and biodegradable single-use options.
The same general principles regarding environmental impact that apply to plastic versus paper bags also generally apply to drinking straws and some other "paper vs plastic" comparisons.
Rwanda pretty much ban all garbage on far less of a budget. I’m willing to bet their politicians don’t make 200k ci a year either
Using my plastic straw as I dine on a big juicy steak with lobster at a restaurant that I drove my Chevy Tahoe to from my posh 65f air conditioned million dollar home.
I’m making a difference!
Furiously trying to enjoy my soda with my paper straw that disentegrates quickly as Taylor Swift hops in her private jet for funsies.
I’m making a difference!
I will no longer single use plastic LFT sticks! Waiting for the bamboo version.
That’s O.K. with me.
Steering Committee? Staffed by who? Where did they get their qualifications? What other jurisdictions have they worked in? Do they have examples of best practice and are they being put in place? Have they had any peer-reviewed papers printed? What expertise are they bringing to the table? The answer to all of the above is that they are related to ‘someone’ high up. End of.
I’m all for it but its a waste of time. single use plastic and no plastic straws etc. etc. while the rest of the worlds big money earning industries churn out more poison every day?
its a waste of time it has to start at the top and work down not vice versa. I spent 30 mins trying to suck my drink up a paper straw my wife insisted we use. never again.
So any small effort on your part is a complete nuisance that you cannot tolerate…???? you are part of the problem. Enough small pebbles dropped in the water can make a difference. Make a positive difference, even a small one.
Paper versus plastic straws does NOT make a “positive difference” to the environment.
You have blindly accepted the anti-plastic propaganda without bothering to check on the results of a wealth of very credible research on the issue.
When you look into the total carbon footprint and general environmental impact throughout the raw material gathering/manufacturing/transport/use/disposal/recycling cycle or “total cycle” of the respective products, you will discover a really nasty surprise regarding paper straws.
Has my peripheral targeted a bale fire, maybe, but also maybe the answer to the quasi headline poser might be here too, 🔥🥤
https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/canadian-environmental-protection-act-registry/notices-objection/dart-container-corporation-february-2022.html
Good catch, but we the public will never know what Dart
is or maybe objecting to in the Cayman Islands WRT this. I’m sure he’s made appropriate contributions to certain individuals to allow sustained sale of his product here though. My opinion is that none of his recycling technologies exist here on the islands and it it will be impossible to capture once used. We have a more fragile environment here just based on scale alone so a ban should also apply to any and all Dart-Tainers.
To add he must have seen the writing on the wall decades ago as he is is touted as such a shrewd individual so why did he not do the required R&D, shift gears, retool and produce containers that are readily 100% compostable without hazardous byproducts as in a backyard compost bin? I don’t mean materials that breakdown into micro-plastics or other so called green containers that still contain a majority fraction of petroleum derived plastic mixed with plant derived plastic.
I say his argument as presented in Canada doe not any hold water here but obviously to our leaders his wallet, power and influence does.
If you look a little further you’ll find certainly in a few cases Dart’s recycling claims aren’t much more than smoke & mirrors, their styrofoam recycling campaign of making picture frames with their appeal against NYC case in point. I found it particularly striking that in this appeal they seem to be using their ‘investments by providing grants for the municipality’s of the US & Canada’ as sub-leverage to support the appeal, – in our case just substitute in parks & acre for acre etc. Dart perhaps without design are openly demonstrating here (as most large corporations do) that they are all about tokens, gains, & opacity but ultimately greed, – they don’t really give a flying **** much beyond that despite what they roll out.
Insightful, thanks!
I use plastic grocery bags to line my trash bin. What am I expected to use if these bags are banned? Don’t jump down my throat, this is an honest question.
A crocus sack with news paper a the bottom like back in the old days.
What is a crocus sack?! What about smelly garbage?
So you get 2 uses for each bag. Good but why not buy trash bags for your bin? Those bags are more environmentally friendly as they break down faster. Plus they are much cheaper since you pay 5 or 10 cents each for most grocery bags but a box of real bags is less per bag.
Don’t let your money leak through your fingers.
Where do you find trash bags for less than 5-10c a piece? I’d love to buy those, thanks for the tip, but what I have seen costs way more. And its single-use.
I believe the supermarkets used to carry plastic carrier bags that broke down quickly, what have they changed?
Actually I reuse fosters bags several times before they are used for trash. Buying trash bags will mean going over to one-time use.
What is in your trash bin?
Trash. … That is what is in my trash bin. The garbage truck crew picks up the garbage twice a week. They are the best!
I don’t have a bucket in my trash bin. Its a wire frame that you drape and secure a plastic bag over. I have no room for a conventional bucket-type bin. Hence using reused fosters bags that fit perfectly!
different bags which have a biodegradable clock of months rather than centuries.
I buy biodegradable trash bags. Fosters sell them and you can also buy them from Eco Cayman
What did people do before plastic garbage can liners? Duhhh! They used unlined wastebaskets and emptied the unlined waste baskets and unlined kitchen bins into unlined garbage cans which were put out for collection along the road. Come collection day, the cans were emptied into the back of the compactor truck and off they went. Rinse cans, repeat. There, now…was that so hard?
I hope you all realize the 95% of all the plastic washing up on the beach is not even from Cayman, so it will be a never ending cleanup if the world do not get its act together.
We can’t control what the rest of the world does. But we can make sure we are part of the solution by doing the right thing.
How absurd it is to push for a single use plastic ban as thousands of automobiles use the roads daily, often idling in traffic jams.
two wrongs….etc.
you could do whataboutery about every issue in the world if you want….
Park the damn cars.
Enact a gas guzzler tax.
Its already here daily at +$6.97 a gallon
True that, but the climate crisis demands massive changes on all fronts otherwise we are leaving a terrible legacy for future generations.
There should be a ban on leaving a car idling
Things that could make a real difference in our emissions problems.
Business and government collaborate on permanent remote work rotations for all web based work to take cars and trucks off roads at peak times.
Establish a proper government bus transit system and build lighted car parks in the districts with restrooms.
Build proper bike lanes.
Reward carpoolers.
Mandate all students in all schools to use busses.
Accelerate renewable energy for our electric grid.
Enncourage use of renewables across the board.
Just like the sargassum. Fertilizer runoff from other countries will never stop and the sargassum mat will grow unchecked.
Phosphorus mining is very profitable as its used in fertilizers globally. With lax environmental protections in other countries, its literally a losing battle.
One more tidbit. The byproduct of phosphorus mining is radioactive gravel.
I suppose we could start by asking who owns the Solo Cup Company.
Han maybe? But I hear he now works for the Dark Side.
he ain’t nothing but a scruffy looking nerfherder….
Your single use legislation might make a difference somewhere in Central America, although I doubt it, but it wll make no difference here. Everything on my beach comes from DR, Cuba or Jamaca.
Don’t blame the cruise ships…just look to the east of the Savannah/Newlands constituency office.
Why not both?
So you want to ban plastic bags and make me go and buy plastic trash bags? – go figure.
Start with refusing to buy disposable items, overpacked items, single use items.
Sometimes “shit we don’t need” are free with purchase, and can still be declined if consumer so-wishes and expresses that preference. Eg. Straw, lid, bag…we can self-direct these decisions once we know why = education
Nothing gets done quickly here. How many years is it since Kurt told us the Glass House was about to be demolished?
Money talks. When countries ban SUPs the companies will see profits fall if they don’t change.
Capitalism is killing our planet. No matter how many paper straws, paper bags, or bans on single use plastics, our seas are under constant attack from chemical runoffs, trash disposal, and fishing nets.
Look north to see one of the world’s worst offenders. From offshore oil drilling that Biden just expanded, to his administration funding police more than climate change policies, to the U.S. military’s massive emissions.
Climate change is real. Its here. Until its profitable for industry, no substantial actions will occur.
We could definitely do with less cars here. Some homes here have 4 or more vehicles. Too many damn cars for the size of the island!
True. Where are the NRA bike lanes?
Safe bike lanes, not simply bike lanes
Have you ever ridden a bicycle on this island??? How we don’t have more cycle deaths is a complete miracle!
Frequently, but would like a safe place to do more. We paid for the lanes that were not delivered. They aren’t even provisioned in new roads being laid and painted. Someone needs to be fired, and we need to find out where our money and goals went.
That’s because 12 people are sharing the home
There aren’t 12 low wage workers living together in the million dollar homea.
Today marks another Earth Overshoot Day. If residents in the Cayman Islands all lived in the same manner as residents of USA, and Canada (and many do), the Overshoot date would have been March 13. You don’t need a calculator to figure we’d need 4x Earth-sized planets to stay within renewable spectrum of conditioned consumptive habits at that pace. If we’re being honest, 5x Earth-sized planets minimum, since 8 billionth person will be born Nov 15,2022 and we already know we are irreversibly on course for at least 10 billion by 2100. Humanity either radically changes and scales back consumption or the planet will within one generation become inhospitable for life. That’s the equation we must solve for. It’s not single use plastic (bring your own and just decline the bag/straw). The time for counting greenwashing issues was perhaps 10 years ago when we didn’t know the bigger picture of IPCC AR6.
https://www.overshootday.org/newsroom/country-overshoot-days/
You would find the phosphorus belt interesting too.
I thought the big man went on a lovely, all-expenses paid trip to a climate change / sustainability conference? Just there for the buffet perhaps.
World Class Civil Service
Every time we visit we bring our own reusable mugs and water bottles. Every time we’re appalled by other visitors using plastic cups and bottles once – and then leaving them around for someone to clear up after them (yes I’m talking about you, Americans!)
Visited for the first time in 3 years recently and nothing had changed in this respect …
As someone who lives here, it isn’t Americans, nor is it the English, Irish, Scottish, South Africans, etc, etc leaving rubbish about and tossing it out the vehicle windows.
Absolutely correct, 4:16. And the thudding bass “music” from their cars too.
Not just Americans…local and from all nations.
Spot the sanctimonious Canadian.Your Overshoot Day was March 13th. IMF estimates >20% of your Federal funds are spent subsidising private companies exploiting the dirtiest crude oil reserves on the planet, with the ambition of doubling production of crude by IEC production grandfathering deadline at 2050. A multinational petroeconomy deal signed in a side-room at COP26. Canadian banks inked more petro-IBK deals last year, than in the last 10. Canadian companies, and investment banks also lead the planet in fraudulent Co2 injection-frack carbon credits that have been sold 5 or 6 times already. Perhaps that’ll be one of the mechanisms for Trudeau plans to meet Carbon neutrality by 2030. He’s going to have to get very creative to offset what’s already underway. You won’t hear about any of that on the greenwashing CBC though. Good work on your cup.
🧐🤔
I wonder how many million dollars have been used buying our leaders NOT to make the use of plastic containers illegal? How about it fearless leaders….. Why haven’t you stopped the use of plastic containers in the Cayman Islands? You are disgusting!!
Why must politicians dictate consumer and merchant behaviour to grownups? It’s pretty easy for most of us to simply say thank and decline wastefulness, bringing our own reusable bag/mug/straw/container, or whatever. Many have been doing successfully for over a generation now, without any help from CIG. Still, none of this makes a hill of beans difference while some crusaders fill their carts with meat and dairy, and then load into a V8-powered SUV for a 0.5mi journey. “Where are the NRA bike lanes”, would be a more topical crusade issue on Earth Overshoot Day, frankly.
while I consider the initiative a good intent, I find , again, that we fail to address the elephant in the room when it comes to the presence of plastics on our beaches, most of which comes from international waters , if you pay attention to the markings on the plastic debris found on our beaches , you will quickly find the provenance is either the USA or Mexico where cruise ship source their provisions for the voyage.
Plastic pollution along the Cayman coastline all but disappeared while cruise ships (floating garbage cans) couldn’t come to island, of course the problem didn’t take long to reappear as soon as they came back!
Most boat operators on island know that their livelihoods depends on providing an experience in a clean environment, only cruise lines are incentivized to rid themselves of their excess trash at sea , if only our dear coast guard chose to enforce the regulations which are already on the books! (MARPOL annex V)!
Maybe some of it from cruise ships. The bulk of the waterborne buoyant plastic waste is wind and current driven from elsewhere. For many poor, corrupt, and/or mismanaged countries, there isn’t functional municipal waste collection happening, so pragmatically, the household trash goes into the river/gully/dyke to begin it’s seaward voyage.
A 2010 study estimated that approximately 25–30 per cent of Jamaica’s garbage is improperly disposed of, often ending up in gullies, drains and rivers, which empty into the sea. No less than 16 gullies empty into Kingston Harbour. After heavy rains, hundreds of plastic bottles bob around in the water, washed down with all kinds of other debris—including bags of human waste—from the gullies into the long-suffering harbour.
In 2016, the Jamaica Environment Trust (JET) published a report entitled “Garbage and the Gully,” specifically focusing on the heavily polluted South Gully in Montego Bay. Pick a poor country: Honduras, Haiti, DR, most of West Coast of Africa…gully dumping is a pervasive cultural norm, sadly.
Monsanto herbicide use worldwide and the resultant runoff will never stop.
Also disgusting is the cruise ships using our waters as their toilet. Google what they’re doing in Canada right now.
Whenever I hear the word committee in Cayman, my attention is lost.
Propaganda with goal of eliminating cars, a/c and humans for that matter.
Well then, i guest that we have two months remaining.
another story to make a mockery of the caymankind mantra….
That BS went out the window a long, long time ago. Not much kindness here anymore.
ever wonder why our national symbol is a turtle?
Anyone on this steering committee from the food service industry?
Here’s a possible solution for all of the plastic
https://www.byfusion.com/byblock/
An excellent solution, however one requiring money and insight and resolve. None of those appear to be in our national wheelhouse.
It’s like the Sargassum — we could and should be collecting it, rinsing it, shredding it and bagging it for sale as seaweed meal. It is the best, most balanced fertiliser, and can even be used in open-system hydroponics as a growth medium.
If we are going to have to pay for collection, we might create a system by which we can make money from it, but all that seems too much like work, right?
Can’t use sargassum as fertilizer for food crops due to heavy metal content.
Arsenic content in some is very high.
But can it be built into 50 storeys?
CIG is flying to environmental conferences, talking about dealing with SMB erosion, reducing our carbon footprint and solving the sargassum problem. How are we going to do all that we can’t even act to ban single use plastics.
What about LFT’s and Masks? Where are all those going?
How about the houses and condos we tear down. Entire mutli-story apartment blocks are piled unsorted into the dumps around the world. PVC, asbestos, you name it. Household consumer waste is less than 20% of total landfill input.
If it doesn’t buy votes or make them or their friends money the idiots who run this island couldn’t care less.
Glad you see it!