CMR owner will argue human rights abuse in appeal

| 12/09/2024 | 138 Comments
Sandra Hill on CMR show, Cayman News Service
Sandra Hill on the CMR show (file photo)

(CNS): Sandra Hill, the owner of Cayman Marl Road and online talk-show host, has been given leave to appeal a 2020 conviction and to instruct a senior lawyer on legal aid to argue the case. The Cayman Islands Court of Appeal president, Sir John Goldring, Thursday, said the case raised human rights issues. Hill is appealing a conviction over the abuse and harassment of Matthew Leslie and a subsequent $3,000 fine.

On a podcast in 2019, Hill accused Leslie of being a sexual predator. The crown claimed she had deliberately targeted him and charged her under section 90 of the Information and Communications Technology Act, which was the first time this law was used to prosecute a member of the media in relation to their work.

While the podcast was controversial, Hill said she had styled the show “Surviving Matthew Leslie” on the famous TV mini-series “Surviving R-Kelly”. During the show, she recounted allegations about Leslie by several anonymous women and accused him of being a paedophile.

She reflected on historic allegations that women were sexually abused by police officers back in the 1990s. Leslie was a member of the RCIPS at that time and had left under a cloud as a result of his connection to those cases.

Despite persistent allegations circulating in the community about Leslie, who has run for elected office twice, he has never been convicted of any sexual offences. However, he was exposed on social media for soliciting a prostitute, which derailed his second attempt to win a seat in the Legislative Assembly in 2017.

Hill was convicted following a judge-alone trial before Justice Roger Chapple, who said she was guilty of cyberbullying, “an awful phenomenon”, and that she was not a proper journalist. She is basing her appeal on the grounds that the judge was wrong in law, that her right to freedom of speech was infringed, and that she was wrongfully prosecuted.

The appeal court said the case raised “significant issues” relating to human rights and freedom of speech, and it merited leading counsel to argue the constitutional matters it brought up.

Local defence attorney Amelia Fosuhene told the court she had been instructed by Hill, who had planned to represent herself during her appeal until the appeal judges intervened. She said they planned to instruct UK-based lawyer Sallie Bennet-Jenkins KC once legal aid cleared their application.

Director of Public Prosecutions Simon Davis had planned to defend the appeal on behalf of the crown when Hill was expected to represent herself. However, he told the court that the prosecution would now also be seeking to either instruct leading counsel or another junior.

He did not tell the court why he would no longer be presenting the crown’s case to uphold the conviction. Since arriving in the Cayman Islands to take up the post of DPP, Davis has not litigated a single case in court.

The case has been adjourned, but the date for the court to hear the arguments has not yet been set.


Share your vote!


How do you feel after reading this?
  • Fascinated
  • Happy
  • Sad
  • Angry
  • Bored
  • Afraid

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Category: Courts, Crime

Comments (138)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anonymous says:

    I’m sorry, how does being caught targeting someone with unsubstantiated accusation warrant a human rights violation for her.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Sandra is the best! Cayman would be so boring without CMR.

    6
    27
  3. Anonymous says:

    The comments are a fascinating, yet sad, reflection on how polarized and at equal times oblivious to our own polarization society has become.

    If you love Sandy/CMR, you can’t believe how wrong and cruel the critics of her/it are.

    If you love Wendy/CNS you can’t believe any fool would think Sandra could lace Wendy’s boots.

    its the same with MSNBC and FOX, Pepsi and Coke, Ben & Jerry (well, maybe not that one). Trump or Harris. Etc, etc.

    the point is, people are so far gone down their own rabbit holes they can’t see for the carrots. The astonishing certainty we all have about our views, which are 90%+ influenced by the media we wish to only believe, is a travesty. We’re all convinced that what we read on the platform or hear from the tv station we decide to frequent has the monopoly on truth and fact. Our media, our candidate, our version is the right one.

    We’re all such easy marks, no wonder Vegas casino’s are so huge – a sucker born every minute, but its definitely not me or you, right?!

    And then one day someone tells us Santa Claus isn’t real, and we’re broken. How could you possibly have misled me so? There’s no way that’s true. Oops. Same with the media.

    its good to disagree with your friends. Its healthy and normal. better when we do it together, resolve it inhouse, and come out stronger. CNS/CMR have more in common than not, and they have the same enemy….

    CNS: You’re couching a discussion about the media in Cayman in the same way as the media is discussed in the US. We (the media houses in Cayman) all have people who disagree with us and object to how we do things and people we clash with. Describing them as the “enemy” is really not helpful and not how we think of them. I suspect that many here would find that term jarring.

    You are also leaning into the relationship of, say, MSNBC versus Fox and the alternative narrative of events (alternative ‘facts’, if you will). This is also not relevant in the Cayman Islands as there is no real right/left conflict.

    The differences between the various media houses is not politics and whose truth is truest so much as style: how news is gathered, how it is presented, what is published and when – is it better to wait until facts can be verified or publish and be damned – and deciding if it should be published at all.

    2
    9
    • Anonymous says:

      CNS- Do you both get paid the same amount for publishing propaganda?

      CNS: If you are a regular reader of CNS, you know perfectly well that we have never taken a single cent to dictate or sway our editorial decisions. By spreading lies and pretending that we do, you are trying to lessen the impact of what we publish, which is desperate and pathetic. Just stop.

      4
      8
  4. Anonymous says:

    According to human rights advocates and many pro-vaccine supporters, demanding that people be forced to take the COVID vaccine was not considered a violation of human rights. But now, all of a sudden, human rights are being brought into play for this case. These are interesting times. I hope this case is won based on human rights, freedom of the press, and freedom of speech, but I also hope that, in the future, human rights for everyone are taken more seriously. We will never forgive nor forget.

    5
    13
  5. Anonymous says:

    Funny how this is the same woman who robbed a large number of people by offering accountancy certificate courses that ended up being completely fake. Many of whom were the same Caymanians she claims to care about so much. She is nothing but a self-loathing, narcissistic bully.

    39
  6. Anonymous says:

    An opportunist, a narcissist, with a very checkered past, and an online bully who traffics in hate, malice and divisiveness. She has also been convicted of another ITC offence involving a jilted lover and defaming his girlfriend. Read the case it was despicable and abominable.
    The sad irony is that CNS and Brent Fuller formerly of the Compass gave her a platform and often characterized her as a community activist.
    A twice-rejected candidate to add to the long list!

    49
  7. Anonymous says:

    It’s taken 5 mins for her to chime in on CNS and its commentators……”people are so cowardly; fake keyboard warriors that hangout in the CNS section”…

    16
  8. Anonymous says:

    She’s got some DSL’S.

    3
    5
  9. Anonymous says:

    A legend in her own lunchtime.

    18
  10. Anonymous says:

    So she goes after someone and accuses them of horrendous acts with NO proof, gets caught out on her own BS and then cries a human rights violation? Another day in Caymanistan.

    53
    1
  11. Anonymous says:

    For all his faults, Matthew has rights too. Nah true Honey Child?

    34
    6
  12. Elvis says:

    Nasty piece of work she is. karma coming

    49
    2
  13. Anonymous says:

    CMR followers have a lot in common with Mac and Kenny voters.

    45
    5
  14. Anonymous says:

    One only needs to glance briefly at her platform to get a full picture of the levels of intellect of her audience.

    65
    8
  15. Anonymous says:

    This article is not shedding any bad light on CMR or Sandy. I don’t know why so many people are offended or defensive. If you read it, it’s just like any other CNS story about someone in court. XXXX Sandy does us all a service by discussing these things in the open. I have zero doubt of the authenticity of her sources.

    14
    42
    • Anonymous says:

      We have identified another source of the problem.

      26
      2
    • Anonymous says:

      Authentication was what was lacking. She claimed she bad all this evidence and was unable to prove anything or even have someone come forward. Think about it… all these other people stepping forward on other persons and not one person stepped forward on Mr. Leslie. That’s the part that’s crazy.

      5
      1
      • Anonymous says:

        “She claimed she bad all this evidence and was unable to prove anything or even have someone come forward.”

        Evidence from the “Cayman Marl Road” of course.

        Voila!

  16. Anonymous says:

    Like her or not, Sandra Hill’s CMR is the ONLY entity in Cayman which comes close to delivering investigative journalism. She calls out corruption, especially in the public service, where it really matters when our resources are at stake!

    Despite what many people feel, she doesn’t seem to take sides; today it’s me, tomorrow it’s you; just as unbiased investigations should be! Whether or not she’s a journalist (?), influencer or just someone with a platform, she has balls! And I’m not anyone’s beeaaatch!

    As for her legal capabilities, she has repeatedly shown that she can run circles around our DPP!! She’ll win again!

    Go Sandra, keep it up! Without the personal street gossip and eating on camera!!

    22
    74
  17. Anonymous says:

    I think the problem is that you all dont like that CMR is a Caymanian-run platform FOR Caymanians. I will NEVER stop listening to her nor stop reading her articles. Sandy, the expats might hate you but your Caymanians LOVE you.

    18
    84
    • Anonymous says:

      I think the problem is that the uneducated idiots who placate her don’t know any better.

      62
      9
    • a says:

      Non exap here; To respond – I don’t hate anyone who follows the law, is ethical, moral, and honest. The fact that CMR is “Caymanian-run” has no importance to me. I don’t like Sandy/CMR because she skirts doing things legally. I get that some here like her – as they also skirt doing things legally, and sadly pride themselves in that character flaw. I really like honesty and transparency; my bad!

      51
      8
    • Anonymous says:

      Caymanians or Jamaicans?

      8
      1
    • Anonymous says:

      You don’t speak for all Caymanians.

      15
  18. Anonymous says:

    Should have heard her this morning commenting to the fact that CNS had written an article on her, that she doesn’t really care as CNS has a handful of readers, it uses Anonymity (unlike her platform) and a litany of other self-praising gospel (which is literally 60-75% of her daily show).

    45
    9
    • Anonymous says:

      CNS only has a handful of readers? Come on.

      35
      5
      • Anonymous says:

        Very few if any read the diatribe articles. In truth, it’s the anonymous comment section which keeps CNS just barely above water.

        Having said that, it still beat CMR, pants down.

        32
        7
      • Anonymous says:

        Same ‘reporter’ that comes for first 10 minutes of a public protest then takes a picture and reports the ‘few’ attendees just to misinform the public that the protest was not well attended/supported BUT doesnt mention the HUNDREDS who attended just a little later on.

        Same ‘reporter’ that had her listeners believing that an esteemed florida hospital would actually call her, a member of the public, with no legal ties to a patient and divulge info aka breach patient confidentiality.

        Nope, two Caymanians in this house that will never listen to her or her nonsense.

    • Anonymous says:

      If you are listening to that shit, you are part of the problem.

      40
      4
      • Anonymous says:

        Then I listen to For the Record on Radio Cayman, then I listen to my stomach grumbling and know its lunchtime #turtlestewfridays

        2
        11
    • Anonymous says:

      You listening? Thats rich.

  19. Cheese Face says:

    Some of the people she calls out fully deserve it (I’m looking at you MPs). But FFS don’t eat on air woman, that’s where I draw the line!

    49
  20. Anonymous says:

    I appreciate the concerns about legal aid, she does own a multi million dollar home in the Highlands. BUT rather alarmingly, the DPP, also publicly funded, is too weak, lazy or otherwise to do it himself. HOW EMBARASSING!!

    43
    2
  21. Anonymous says:

    shame on you, wayne.

    25
    2
  22. Anonymous says:

    I don’t love everything she does or says however she is a necessary evil because at the end of the day she ain’t afraid to bring many things to light that we otherwise would never know about…. we should do our own research and fact check EVERYTHING that is published anyways… if she brings it up best believe there is something to it… may not be the full truth but at least we are informed and can find out the truth for ourselves…

    26
    24
  23. Anonymous says:

    “She recounted allegations about Leslie by several anonymous women and accused him of being a paedophile”, “Leslie was a member of the RCIPS at that time and had left under a cloud as a result of his connection to those cases”, and “he was exposed on social media for soliciting a prostitute”…either these concerning accusations are true or not. Sandra shouldn’t be the one on trial as relaying messenger, unless these things are untrue. The public has an interest in knowing the truth. We need MORE people stepping forward to report historic abuses, not less.

    17
    26
    • Anonymous says:

      That’s a dangerous precedent to set. What stops me or you or anyone from saying “Joe Smith molested a bunch of kids, my anonymous sources who won’t file police reports said so”?

      You can make an official report and remain anonymous in cases like this with RCiPS and many other law enforcement agencies. It’s pretty much standard for sexual assault cases.

      This is not the only instance of her saying something and reporting it as fact and quoting her “sources”. Nobody fact checks her. That’s not OK.

      You don’t see compass, or CNS making such allegations without any proof do you? Btw it’s very common for legit journalists to cite anonymous sources…when there REALLY is a legit anonymous source.

      46
      2
      • Anonymous says:

        Yes; if you don’t want to stand behind your accusations – don’t make them!

        15
        • Anonymous says:

          That’s the problem -she doesn’t stand by them. She reports them as “rumours” because she knows she can get away with it with zero evidence, zero sources, and zero accountability. She is a cowardly snake and it is amazing that she has managed to dupe so many people. Then again, she’s been doing it since she used to run micromatrix and charge people for quickbooks certificates that weren’t worth the paper they were printed on.

          26
          1
      • Anonymous says:

        We know how it should work in the real world, but how it actually works here, leads us to disagree. Living how corrupt it is, as we do, she was correct not to name the firsthand witnesses. Protection against retribution, does not mean these things didn’t happen. Our police and DPP do not exercise the same degree of candour with privacy and identifier information that is warranted, more crooks would be behind bars where they belong, instead of on the loose, with fewer maladministrative exonerations on mistrial if this trust wasn’t violated ritually. The police can check that she had sources or not, if they want to do that, but they would rather bury this narrative, and protect the naughty boys club.

        • Anonymous says:

          She’s right not to name them. But that’s assuming they actually exist. She’s so shady and flippant with this we have no idea whatsoever if ANY of her supposed sources even exist to begin with.

          9
          1
      • Anonymous says:

        “unless these things are untrue” – proof that.

    • Anonymous says:

      Shut up Sandra !

      23
      6
  24. Anonymous says:

    CMR = scourge

    28
    7
  25. Anonymous says:

    Inspired by vybez Kartel I guess..smh

    I wish the Appeal Court would find cause to jail her ass during this “appeal”.

    She is soley responsible for the “dumbing down” of our News media. And the clows who attend her class daily to tune in the the scandals, defamation, personal attacks and inciteful commentary need to really consider the damage they are causing to their brians. She is developing a following of arses that would make Jim Jones shudder.

    37
    5
    • Anonymous says:

      Her appeal was launched in 2021 and approved long ago how is that inspired by Kartel?

      3
      4
    • Anonymous says:

      You appear to know a lot about how many tuning in. I’m sure you are first to class EVERY morning 😂

      1
      3
  26. Anonymous says:

    I hope all of her victims are given an opportunity to speak

    50
    9
  27. Anonymous says:

    Just yesterday she was traipsing through an ongoing police incident and demanding access to the “action” basically distracting the Police during an operation where an officer was injured. Acted like she was to be allowed in becasue she is “Auntie Sandy” meanwhile the officers who had to deal with her were not watching their fellow officers backs.

    65
    7
    • J says:

      An “ongoing police incident” wherein the RCIPS failed to properly secure the suspect in their vehicle? The incident wherein the police failed to remove the knife from the suspect? The incident in which a group of RCIPS officers, clearly unable to swim and due to their own compounded incompetence, created a scene of trajic comedy due to said compounded incompetence. Would this incident which you are referring to have been kept from the public’s knowledge if it were not for CMR? You may have a problem with CMR and Sandra herself, but she is filling a vacuum which has been created by the maladministration an dereliction of duty as it pertains to any conceivable concept of a supposed “good governance” in and of the Cayman Islands. She is the symptom, the cause of which you and those like you do not have the humility, the sense, the honesty, the courage or the integrity to recognize and/or address, to say nothing of seeking to rectify the causative factors which led up to the “incident”. Your mentality is the real problem. Anyone can see that CMR is not real journalism from the standpoint of an objective impartiality, but then again, there is no other media house in the Cayman Islands which is either.

      16
      23
    • Anonymous says:

      Given the way our police act I think having external witnesses is quite helpful! I wonder if Dwayne would have escaped being breathalyzed if Sandy had been there filming it. As for the specific incident, would have been interesting to see how a woman arrested for wielding a knife and allegedly cutting an officer managed to escape from the back of a police car (and presumably not handcuffed) and arm herself before hitting the water at the Wharf.

      20
      1
    • Grouper Lips Brigade says:

      The same incident where the RCIPS failed to properly secure the suspect or remove a knife from her. Would the public be aware of this latest bout of gross negligence and incompetence on behalf of the RCIPS if it were not for CMR? And you are concerned with her? Something is very wrong with you.

      12
      9
  28. Anonymous says:

    This one believe she Uncle Luke now.

    18
    2
  29. Anonymous says:

    Human Rights works both ways, might want to tread lightly there.

    44
    2
  30. Anonymous says:

    Legal aid!!????????
    She owns a multi million dollar house – actually a duplex that she rents out in the highlands and another house and judging by the way she supports Wayne he is paying her handsomely!!! The breach of human rights is wasting public funds to pay her legal fees!

    89
    5
    • Anonymous says:

      Catron is paid by individuals and big businesses who can afford to pay the ransom to keep her on side. It’s just easier that way.

      18
      • Anonymous says:

        8:31; it would appear then that CUC are paying her a sh*t ton.

        • Anonymous says:

          Health City as well, with their pro-pill, anti-cannabis crusade. I love the hilarious irony of her discussing the health risks of cannabis, and in the same day posting giant ads for Burger King quadruple stackers. Oh, and she closes the comments any time someone brings it up. Couldn’t dare risk that gravy train, despite the fact that obesity is killing our people more than anything.

          11
          • Anonymous says:

            All the while speaking with her mouth full of fried breakfast every morning and how she needs to do some exercise..

  31. Anonymous says:

    The fact that she planned to represent herself speaks volumes to the adage suggesting she has a fool for a client.

    She is not a real journalist and admits as much herself anytime she’s in hot water she reverts to “we’re a gossip site” to avoid getting in trouble.

    Leslie may or may not be a piece of garbage but the reality is she absolutely was being a cyber bully. She prints whatever she wants and says whatever she wants with no repercussions and is never held accountable for her stories.

    She’s gotten a tiny bit better but let’s not forget she used to post pictures of dead bodies so their families could find out from instagram instead of some proper channel.

    It’s disturbing how much we need CMR, because at the end of the day she’s quickest to print most stories (and often has the most stories to print). But she’s got to be held to a standard.

    Do better.

    87
    3
    • Anonymous says:

      Apart from all of that, she is the ONLY one who calls out our high and mighty, who would otherwise slither in the dark and try to get away with their underhand practices.
      She is a very necessary evil .

      18
      20
  32. Anonymous says:

    Sandra Hill is a bully. She preys on the weak and behaves like she is holier than though. Her behavior in public is of someone who believes they are above the law, and she treats people absolutely horribly, then calls people out on her show for doing the same. it is a royal shame we glorify this woman, when she is the problem with society

    108
    7
  33. Anonymous says:

    “He did not tell the court why he would no longer be presenting the crown’s case to uphold the conviction. Since arriving in the Cayman Islands to take up the post of DPP, Davis has not litigated a single case in court.”

    That sums up all you need to know about the shenanigans of the DPP’s office. The have spent millions on outside counsel to fight cases all while collecting a huge salary from the Cayman Islands government as their legal arm! Make it make sense why Caymanians are not more up in arms about what goes on in the office.

    LTD Da Unboozler

    45
  34. Anonymous says:

    What are Sandra Hill’s qualifications as a journalist – she’s just another blogger or influencer.

    52
    4
    • Anonymous says:

      She has balls.

      8
      7
      • Anonymous says:

        We didnt ask for its sex we asked what are its qualifications!

        12
        • Anon says:

          Personally I can’t stand her
          Her profanity on air is disgusting
          She engages with minors on line
          And goads them
          She skirts the law and prints untruths.
          If it were in the street she would be arrested for grooming and or a public order offence / insulting the modesty of a women! The list goes on .
          But because she’s stuffing her face on line behind a camera. She skirts the law with impunity.
          There isn’t anything that she wont do for clicks.
          Some local politicians ( Kenny/ Wayne) support her? I wonder why?
          And the RCIP leaks confidential information ( beware what you tell them, your name could end on CMR)

          The biggest shame is the Caymanian people spend millions on the tourism product to attract people to the island. Then tourist read this utter gutter tripe from her.
          What a great world wide image she gives of the Cayman islands.
          Her Faithfull followers and level of their intelligence says it all.

          12
    • Anonymous says:

      And so what? Still #1 in Cayman!

      5
      24
      • Anonymous says:

        #1 my back foot. Ask her why she doesn’t ban all the bot accounts that post fake links every time she posts an incident. They provide thousands of impressions just like real accounts, and it is what allows her to keep selling moron marketing teams on her “viewership”.

        21
        2
      • Anonymous says:

        #1 to you maybe

      • Anonymous says:

        More like a No.2

    • Anonymous says:

      I guess she is a qualified journalist as much as she is a qualified attorney. As the saying goes “fake it until you make it”

      10
  35. Anonymous says:

    Can’t we get rid of this stain called Sandra? She is a purveyor of gossip and hate and is by no means a journalist. Maybe it’s time Cayman had a journalist code of conduct…

    59
    13
    • Anonymous says:

      We do have tenants of journalism – be first but be right above all. Be fair and unbiased. But first, one must truly be a journalist—and above all. While [she] does bring important issues to light, the damage caused by her approach is too great a price to pay, and her biases are evident.
      Take the case of Mr. Leslie. He has not been convicted of any crime, and while it’s true he left the RCIPS, there are no confirmed facts surrounding the reasons for his departure. Yes, the abuses faced by women in these islands are significant, but we cannot afford to publish claims that are not 100% true.
      Furthermore, how much is [she] being paid for this work? It’s alarming to think that she might be eligible for legal aid when her website generates hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue. This doesn’t reflect good governance or ethical journalism. The damage she inflicts is not worth the cost

      7
      8
  36. WBW Czar. says:

    Sandy will win.

    24
    16
    • Anonymous says:

      lets hope freedom of speech wins and not Sandra. She needs to be held accountable to some sort of code of conduct.

      22
      2
  37. Anonymous says:

    vile individual….for whom karma will catch up with her properly someday.

    63
    10
  38. Anonymous says:

    why does she need legal aid?

    59
    3
    • Anonymous says:

      Becasue she is a sick twisted opportunist that just looking likes. Look at the crosssection of her fan club led by Johan Moxam. she regularly calls him an idiot and he laps it up and comes back for more. Stockholm syndrome I think they call it! Wayne has a touch of it too. Either that or something far more twisted and sick…vomit!

      31
      5
      • Johann Moxam says:

        CMR’s daily show and content is a mixture of the following:

        News

        Cayman politics & POLITRICKS ,

        Salacious gossip,

        Holding government agencies accountable,
        demanding responses from RCIPS etc.

        Getting answers from the head of the civil service, the Deputy Governor Manderson who actually takes Sandy Hill’s impromptu calls live and direct ON AIR. He knows to gives answers to questions with assurances “to get to the bottom of the complaints or look into the issues” or else etc. (Do you know anyone else the Deputy Governor responds to publicly?)

        A collection old Caymanian history & stories,

        Pure old fashioned “bad mind”

        Irreverent comedy,

        A Caymanian hobby called “settling scores”

        A dose of misdirection and misinformation like most media platforms

        Acting as an unofficial detective agency

        Outing sexual predators and pedophiles in the community

        “Bun Fridays”

        The extra time sessions after 9.30am once the show is no longer on live radio… is usually when the mayhem truly begins.

        No one needs to like her or agree with her…I know we disagree live ON AIR often.

        Everyone has a choice to turn it off or go along with the daily CMR Rollercoaster where it seems that no one is beyond “mob justice” and that special treatment when Aunty Sandy’s breaker trips!

        As for me…I’m addicted to her brownies….i hold her accountable which incenses her and most people but I have a thick skin…you should try it and not worry about others that not worried about you 😉

        Btw- no need for anonymity when complaining about something or somebody.

        Regards

        Johann Moxam

        21
        30
    • Anonymous says:

      Because Wayne is being a bit more careful with his “loans” these days?

      21
      5
      • Anonymous says:

        Not judging by how many lies she advances on his behalf and how hard she is trying to make him seem like he’s a good person- I would like to know where her financing for that beautiful million dollar duplex came from- maybe somebody should check that land register as well.

        7
        9
        • Anonymous says:

          What’s stopping you from checking the register ? Always about what someone else should do. Or maybe you should check CNB😉

          • Anonymous says:

            Her business is akin to journalistic blackmail. If any politician doesn’t cut her a cheque she airs their dirty laundry. If they cut her a big enough cheque she praises and reps them- just like she does with Wayne. It’s not journalism, it’s politricks. There’s nothing genuine about that gross woman.

    • Anonymous says:

      The judges ordered it. What are you missing? Oh yes, CNS was not there that day so of course they didn’t get any of that info. Carry on!

      3
      9
    • Anonymous says:

      Ask the judge who recommended it. She didn’t request it. She went there with intentions of representing herself, however the judge wanted senior counsel, so if this is at their request why should she be responsible for securing one ??

      1
      1
      • Anonymous says:

        The third person stuff is blatantly obvious. Just sign your name.

        • Anonymous says:

          another sign that she is mentally unstable..talks about herself in 3rd person LMAO. Sandra anyone with sense can tell its you posting. This is almost as funny as when she publishes very biased news stories about herself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.