UPM divided over additional referendum questions

| 26/08/2024 | 5 Comments
Cayman News Service

(CNS): Tourism Minister Kenneth Bryan still supports adding more topics to the referendum that the UPM government has said it is going to hold before the end of the year on the question of cruise berthing facilities. Speaking on Radio Cayman, Bryan, who acknowledged that he is known in some circles as “Referendum Man”, said he would like to add questions about legalising gambling and ganja to the ballot but the UPM caucus does not support expanding the vote.

The UPM has proposed holding a referendum in October or November on whether or not Cayman should develop a cruise berthing pier. Bryan said he still wanted to include the other questions but he had not been able to sway all his colleagues. He blamed former premier Wayne Panton for not setting a referendum on the issue of a national lottery or numbers game for Cayman or a vote on decriminalising ganja.

Answering questions from Elvis McKeever, who ran for the Cayman Brac East seat in 2021, running against Juliana O’Connor-Connolly on a platform of legalising cannabis, Bryan said it was Panton who had failed to bring a referendum on that and the lottery issue before he was ousted from office. However, the minister did not explain why the UPM had also failed to do so in the nine and a half months since the coup to remove him.

McKeever pointed out that Bryan and his colleagues “had thrown the man away”, so he couldn’t follow through. He said O’Connor-Connolly was premier now and she had promised the people of Cayman Brac East a vote on decriminalising ganja when she had stolen his main platform agenda in the last weeks of the campaign.

McKeever eventually lost 107 to 266 votes, but before O’Connor-Connolly changed her position on ganja, it had looked as though it would be a much tighter race.

Bryan said that he had continued to agitate for the vote because he believes people should be involved in making important decisions, but until there was a majority in the caucus, it was not going to happen. He said the majority of government MPs had agreed only to the cruise question.

“I still think the country needs to make the call on the decriminalisation of marijuana — not legalisation. Let me make sure that is clear because some people want it to be legalised. I do not agree with that. I agree that it should be decriminalised as it should not be something that ruins young people’s lives or old people’s lives,” he said.

The minister also said he wanted to see a national lottery to stop criminalising people for buying a number if they want to, which was a hindrance to people even though it is commonly accepted. But his colleagues do not agree.

“Until you have a majority of people in government agreeing to it, it can’t come. My position hasn’t changed now. I haven’t gotten enough support from my colleagues to do that so it is not on the referendum ticket,” he said refusing to name who was or was not supporting it.

McKeever said that, given the support across the Cayman Islands for legalisation, the government needs to do that vote. If it doesn’t, those MPs will not get re-elected because they have failed to fulfil the promise and people won’t believe them the next time.

Bryan said that McKeever, a well-known local proponent of legalizing weed, was free to make his demands. However, he noted that McKeever had been consistent with his position and he understood his frustration.

The minister said that he believed people fully understand the difference between decriminalisation and legalisation, which is very different: with decriminalisation, people who are found in possession can be fined but do not get a criminal record, but would not allow people to sell, grow or even possess small amounts. The present law in Cayman criminalises possession and consumption unless it has been prescribed by a medical professional.

Any referendum that takes place under the UPM relating to ganja will be about wiping out existing criminal records and ensuring no one goes to prison for consumption and possession. However, they will still incur fines and people could still go to jail for growing their own plants.


Share your vote!


How do you feel after reading this?
  • Fascinated
  • Happy
  • Sad
  • Angry
  • Bored
  • Afraid
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Category: Policy, Politics

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anonymous says:

    He is known as a lot of things. “Referendum Man” is not one of them.

  2. Clarity Sage says:

    Caymanians, do not be fooled by incompetent and deceitful leaders.

    As is often the case, Kenneth is lying.
    As is ALWAYS the case, he doesn’t understand the economy.

    He, Julianna, Jonjon and their band of self serving MPs are only looking out for themselves and the rich people who fund them. Andre, Sabrina, Kathy – how do you allow this to happen? You are all culpable in this waste of money.

    Insisting on spending a million dollars on a referendum to ask about cruise berthing is absurd. We do not have an economic development plan.

    Starting in some random point in the middle is a sure way to get the answer wrong. Start at the beginning.

    The country. What is our vision for this country?
    And then, what is our vision for the economy, the people, the environment?

    Now, let’s look at the Economy. What do we need from our economy?
    -Revenue for Government?
    -Jobs for Caymanians?
    -Opportunities for Caymanian business owners to expand?
    -Opportunities for new Caymanian businesses?

    Which industries can give us those benefits and at what costs? Can we get those benefits elsewhere and at a lower financial cost that investing in cruise berthing?

    What choices do we have? Do the work of analysing other options.

    Because it is wrong and deceitful to suggest that if we don’t have cruise berthing those jobs and that revenue will disappear and there is no alternative.

    We CAN have a cruise industry without cruise berthing.

    Maybe the Hamaty children and the children of other cruise merchants won’t make as many millions as they had hoped to make, but they will still be alright and their children will still be alright. They are already millionaires and better off than most Caymanians.

    Caymanians, don’t be fooled. The question is not whether we want cruise berthing or not.

    The question is how do we shape this economy to best serve our people? Which industries can generate the greatest benefits for Caymanians, today and in the future, without saddling the Government with debt or destroying our quality of life.

    Asking about cruise berthing is _ssbackwards and upside down Kenneth.

    It’s not about cruise berthing, so don’t waste our money and our time with this referendum.

  3. Anonymous says:

    how depressing …when anyone with a brain can decide on these issue in 5 mins(and has been done elsewhere)
    but here in cayman,,,we spend years talking about a possible referendum…which may lead to possible law changes in many years time…
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    ever wonder why the national symbol is a turtle?

  4. Anonymous says:

    cayman….as usual, decades behind other modern jurisdictions.
    yawn,,,,just another day in wonderland

  5. Anonymous says:

    Elected to government and eventually becoming Premier on the back of 266 votes is absolute insanity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.