Port heading for fiscal turnaround
(CNS): The acting director and chief financial officer of the Port Authority both told the Public Account Committee (PAC) Wednesday that the facility was facing a turnaround in its financial fortunes and expected to have turned its negative liabilities versus assets situation around by the end of this fiscal year.
At a surprise PAC hearing, which was not publicized, the three members who turned up heard that the port’s previous problem of liabilities outweighing its assets by more than $3.8 million would be in a positive position of assets outweighing liabilities to the tune of around $2 million by the end of this financial year.
Clement Reid, the acting managing director of the Port Authority, and its chief financial officer, James Parsons, were among a number of witness from government companies and statutory authorities as well as the CFOs from core government called to PAC to discuss the findings of the auditor general’s reports on financial and performance reporting and the consolidated accounts for the year ended 30 June 2011.
In those reports the auditor general had identified some significant problems for the port, and although there are still plenty of problems for the new director, whenever they are recruited, to address the future viability of the port, it looks more promising after Parsons explained that a combination of factors had helped to stem and effectively turn around the losses.
Parsons said that from a negative position of $3.8 million in 2011 the authority had gradually reduced the liabilities as the country recovered from its economic slump. Lower interest rates on the loans and cargo fee increases, combined with a growth in imports and a significant increase in cruise passengers had led to an anticipated positive situation of assets exceeding liabilities by some $2 million, making the port, once again, a viable concern, the CFO told the committee.
The PAC, however, heard that there were still problems, especially regarding tender fees, as a result of a deal the previous government had signed with the Florida-Caribbean Cruise Association (FCCA) agreeing to freeze tender costs until 2017 in exchange for a commitment from the cruise lines to contribute to the port development costs.
However, the port increased the fees to the tender agencies and the owners attempted to pass those on to the cruise lines, but because of the deal they would not pay and the previous tourism minister, McKeeva Bush, had instructed the port not to collect the fee increase, leaving the authority in breach of its regulations.
Neither Bush, who is the deputy chair of PAC, nor his West Bay party colleague and PAC member, Captain Eugene Ebanks, turned up to the meeting, so there was no explanation forthcoming about how that situation had arisen.
Despite still facing numerous problems, both Parsons and Reid were upbeat about the future of the port and said that governance issues and many other problems identified were being addressed. The men also said the current board had all been through good governance training, had signed their interest declarations and were taking a hands-off approach when it came to the day to day running of port operations, concentrating on the more strategic elements of the authority.
The port is now in the process of recruiting a new director after Paul Hurlston, the former boss, was placed on leave for the remainder of his contract, which will not be renewed. See related story.
Check back to CNS tomorrow for more from the PAC.
Category: Government Finance, Local News, Politics
Jonas – The tender fees problem has been reported by the Port previously.
Hah
A few weeks ago it was in a horrible situation now its expecting a turnaround. We are not born yesterday port directors, something is a funny here. Like what the special guest at power of the purse said yesterday something is wrong I just can put my finger on it.
I totally agree. Now that they got rid of the old port director watch to see which yes man the PPM put in there…and don’t tell me that the ministry is unbiased,
Wow what a miracle that their finances will be fine again so quickly! Something stinks!
Your attitude stinks.
CNS – might you have access to the Auditor General’s Reports which are presently being discussed in PAC and post online, please?
CNS: I have added the links.
try paying the workers what they are worth not double the rate for drivers etc.
And if they don’t have any more ‘lets pay money to build a dock – oh, wait’ trip-ups they shouldn’t end up going back in debt either.
This statement by the Ports CFO is so dumb. The Ports overall financial position, ebbs and flows due to cyclical economic movements and cruise passenger flows. The Port is operationally bloated, overtime compensation is ridiculously high and Management salaries exorbitant and yes they were large unwarranted pay outs during the last administration.
It is after all these years of milking the cow that Management is now providing input and being outspoken , but if you note carefully nary a word has been said that of remedies or out of the box thinking to solve and indeed improve the financial situation. This is what highly paid Managers do they don’t just sit and moan they find practical solutions, You will note that blame is now being cast on the tender fees, why has it taken so long to divulge this is the question the CFO should answer, when they were giving out port workings information to then opposition why did they not bring this up, for in doing so it could have brought the issue to the fore. This is an exercise to corn swobble the public and the only way to really recover is to either ensure that Manage,ent is up to speed with Financial Management and has the vision and the aptitude to craft and obtain approval to execute a 2015 Strategic plan that creates sustainable profitability. Otherwise as the song says ” you’ll have to Go”.