Domestic court idea backed by charity
(CNS): Proposals for a domestic court set out by the criminal justice advisor Claire Wetton in her recent report on the local criminal justice system have won support from a charity dealing with victims of domestic violence because they say it will lead to more successful prosecutions. The Cayman Islands Crisis Centre has offered its backing to the proposal for a specialist domestic court to fast track cases, better protection for witnesses and victims, as well as the call for allowing other people to testify when victims retract their statements.
Speaking on behalf of the CICC, the board’s chair Denise Gower said that evidence from other jurisdictions supports Wetton’s position and that cases dealt with more quickly would “lead to fewer retracted statements and a higher level of justice”. Gower said that allowing ‘hearsay evidence’ when victims retract and separate waiting rooms for victims and perpetrators could make a significant difference in the number of successful prosecutions.
Wetton found in her report that witnesses across the board are not well managed or protected in the Cayman Islands criminal justice system and this has an even greater impact on the victims of domestic violence.
“There is little by way of witness care at the court and the police do not have a witness care unit,” Wetton wrote in her report. “This was particularly apparent at court, as there is no separate waiting area for victims and witnesses and they often sit in the same waiting area as the defendant and his/her supporters outside of the courtroom.”
Recommending possible immediate solutions, such as using an interview room, she said in the long term a dedicated witness waiting area, separate from the defendants, was needed.
Gower agreed that this is a significant problem for the victims in such cases.
“When you think that people who live in abusive relationships are coerced and bullied constantly, it is reasonable to understand that the brave woman who goes to the courthouse on the scheduled day determined to give her testimony might be convinced otherwise when faced with her abuser and his supporters in the waiting room,” she said, as she offered her support to Wetton’s recommendations.
Wetton also raised concern over the more general lack of witness care in domestic cases and the delay in bringing those cases to courts, as she said it had a direct impact on the progress and subsequent outcome of those cases. As a result, a sub-group has been established from the new Criminal Justice Board to consider the issues involved at an operational level. It will now examine ways to expedite domestic violence and cases involving child witnesses and the feasibility of a dedicated domestic violence court.
“The time taken to prosecute domestic violence cases often means that by the time the case has reached the summary court, the victim wishes to retract and this generates adjournments whilst retraction statements are obtained and the case is reviewed by the DPP,” she said, noting that a zero tolerance policy in relation to domestic violence sees all cases go to court in the first instance, but once the victim retracts the cases are dropped.
“A dedicated domestic violence court where cases can be fast tracked, with the cases being listed within twenty-four hours of the complaint would reduce the number of retractions and delay in the process, which can be a number of weeks before the case is charged,” the advisor wrote. “There have been successes in domestic violence prosecutions in England and Wales, due to effective investigations and prosecuting cases without the victim giving evidence,” she stated.
Wetton explained that the admissibility of hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings could be adopted in the Cayman courts as part of legislation to support domestic violence prosecutions. The advisor admitted that prosecutions without a victim are challenging but allowing those who have seen the victims abused to testify in domestic cases can still lead to successful prosecutions.
Gower, who agreed with Wetton, pointed to many reasons why victims often retract their evidence. She also believes that more people abused in domestic circumstances would pursue prosecutions if they happened quickly. Fear, embarrassment, low self-esteem and the love victims usually have for their abusers can all compound and lead to retractions if victims have to wait many months for hearing dates.
“It robs the victim of a sense of hope for the future, the sense that the judicial system cares about her and her children,” said Gower, who offered full support for the necessary legislative and operational changes.
If you or someone you know is being abused – whether psychologically, physically, sexually, verbally or emotionally – call our 24-hour confidential emergency hotline at 943-2422. The Crisis Centre accepts calls from everyone and can help you to find a path to a life free from violence.
Hi CNS,
This message is regarding “Woman faces corruption charge of $100 bung”.
What is a “bung”? Shouldn’t it be “BRIBE”?
The key to communication is knowing your audience, and Caymanians are most likely unfamiliar with the term “bung”. Please reconsider.
Thanks.
I am amazed at the lack of interest in this article. This is a real Cayman problem, with real consequences for many Caymanians. Yet, little comment. Now if we are talking LBGT rights which will not affect the life of any Caymanian that doesn’t want it to….hellfire and brimstone rain down. Where are all the Christians on this much more important and relevant issue? And you wonder why anytime a so called Christian pops up on here they get vilified?? This is why I will not go to Church. Smug, self glorifying bigots.
I implore the government to make the changes as proposed by Clair Wetton. By making the changes it will give the victims of abuse the confidence that the court system is on their side and not on the side of the perpetrator. Right now victims of abuse have little faith in the fact that the justice system cares. By speeding the process up it means that justice can be determined sooner making it possible for the victim to move on with their life rather than spending months in limbo second guessing the decision to try to break free for a life of abuse.
I applaud the Board of the Crisis Centre for speaking out on this issue and I leave the ball in the governments court by asking this question. ” Do you truly care about the victims of abuse in our country? If so make the changes!”
This is a step in the right direction and probably one of the most significant improvements in the criminal justice system and victim’s rights along with speedier trials. And despite what one defense lawyer has said they too have contributed to excessive delays as I was a witness in a case and every time the defense attorney was the one seeking an adjournment and it had nothing to do with disclosure but probably trying to get paid before he said that his client intends to plead guilty. The Chief Justice is to be commended for moving swiftly by adopting and issuing the Practice Directive capping the number of adjournments. Justice delayed is justice denied. Just don’t let it sit on the shelves and gather dust.
Thank goodness. I feel so bad for any woman (or man) suffering domestic abuse.
I know too many people who hide the domestic violence they endure. It is so sad and heartbreaking. It happened to me as well and I thought no one knew until my aunt confronted my ex about what he was doing to me which made him stop as I was so ashamed to reveal it. I really hope having a court solely dedicated to enforcing the laws against domestic violence and exposing the abusers helps put an end to it.
Exactly, I am so glad you touched on the fact that men do suffer from domestic violence as well. And the changes should apply to both and children; equally and fairly. Too many times I have seen and heard of a smaller number of men not getting justice from the judiciary, more specifically, how the police handles situations when men do report domestic violence. No one should feel helpless in such a situation. And I am very concerned with how gender specific this article is… not fully capturing the extent and seriousness of domestic violence to EVERYONE.
Do we have an anger management programme for women as well? Human Rights Commission and Minister of Gender Affairs, how are you guys going about resolving these issues?
Another thing, the system has to be very careful in what evidence they admit, remembering that abusers tend to also be master manipulators… the truth will not always be distinguishable. I have read of situations where people manipulate the systems with lies and some levels of fraud to achieve damage to a person equal to that of physical violence. Hear say is far too wide to be classified as evidence/ proof.