BO law under review ahead of public register

| 09/09/2021 | 6 Comments
Cayman News Service

(CNS): The public is being invited to comment on the government’s proposals to reshape the Cayman Islands’ beneficial ownership legislation into a single law to make it more effective in fighting crime and to pave the way to meet the forthcoming changes to the regime, which is expected to lift the lid on who really owns what in the world of international finance.

A consultation paper released Tuesday, Enhancement of the Beneficial Ownership Framework, includes questions for the public to consider about how Cayman’s financial sector manages the law around beneficial owners — those who ultimately own or control an entity that may be held in another name.

“This consultation is important because a strong beneficial ownership framework strengthens our commitment to fight criminality, not just locally but also globally,” said Financial Services Minister André Ebanks. “Government’s proposals are therefore intended to place Cayman in an even stronger position with global standards that fight criminal activity, such as money laundering and terrorist financing, and at the same time creating a more streamlined and concise legislative act.”

In 2017 Cayman and other UK Overseas Territories entered into agreements, called Exchange of Notes, with the UK. These further strengthened the territories’ respective beneficial ownership frameworks, Ebanks explained. “But as global standards for these frameworks continue to evolve, it’s necessary to revisit ours to ensure such standards are observed in a proactive, transparent, orderly manner,” he said.

After a holistic review of the legal acts that make up the beneficial ownership framework, the consultation takes account of the current global standards for beneficial ownership, set by the Financial Action Task Force and Cayman’s 2019 commitment to introduce a public beneficial ownership register by 2023. The latest review also includes feedback to date from Cayman’s financial services industry and data security.

Three key acts — the Companies, Limited Liability Companies and Limited Liability Partnership — would be amended under the proposals. Ebanks also said consequential amendments to any other act that references beneficial ownership provisions would be made. The ministry is asking the public to comment on six main proposed changes to the existing framework.

  1. Creating a single act for beneficial ownership, in line with other jurisdictions including the Bahamas, the Isle of Man, Guernsey, Jersey, and the British Virgin Islands.
  2. Including limited partnerships and exempted limited partnerships into the framework, in
    anticipation of changes to the global standard.
  3. Requiring additional data reporting, including the nationality of the beneficial owner and
    the mechanism by which the beneficial owner holds control.
  4. Reducing filing duplications as much as possible to make it easier for the financial
    services industry to file beneficial ownership information with General Registry, which is
    the competent authority for this purpose. A “competent authority” is a person or
    organisation that has legal authority to perform a specific function. In this case, General
    Registry is the competent authority for receiving, maintaining and providing access to the beneficial ownership register.
  5. Improving access to beneficial ownership information for other local and international
    competent authorities and financial institutions, in preparation for public access.
  6. Obligating those accessing beneficial ownership information to inform General Registry
    of any discrepancies in the information.

The consultation paper is in the CNS Library.

The window of opportunity for comment closes on Monday, 4 October.


Share your vote!


How do you feel after reading this?
  • Fascinated
  • Happy
  • Sad
  • Angry
  • Bored
  • Afraid
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags: ,

Category: Business, Financial Services, Laws, Politics

Comments (6)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anonymous says:

    Seems smelly to me.

  2. Anon says:

    There is one question relating to a lack of Beneficial ownership transparency.
    It is “Why?”
    When we can’t answer that question without suspecting criminality it is time to enforce an open register with clear requirements for required proof of ID and necessary checks.
    Suspecting criminality is on a scalar score of 3 out of 10 when 10 equals definitive proof.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Meanwhile, Fronting, which by its very nature includes a masking of Beneficial Ownership, is mainstream. Facilitated by the regulatory authorities through a failure and even refusal to investigate, let alone prosecute.

    • Anonymous says:

      Ah, but well-connected so called “Officers of the Court” are making the arrangements, with impunity. #Legge was Right.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Guess I’ll have to have my holding company reincorporated in Delaware.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.