Election boundaries
Somebody needs to explain whether the single member election districts have to follow the borders of the present districts or can cross over. It seems to me that if East End or Northside are a little short of having enough voters to be equal sized with the other single member districts, it really wouldn't be all that tough to draw the line a little further up the highway so the number of voters in the little districts would be higher and more equal to the other districts. I mean how different are the needs of people living on one end of Frank Sound Road from the other end? As to the sister islands, are they really guaranteed two MLA's?
If so, put some East Enders in there so there are enough people to justify two reps. If the present district boundaries are written in stone, some people are always going to be more equal than others. Either way, I think people are going to be amazed how much different and better it is if OMOV goes in.
Viewpoints
-
Annie Oakley(Read more)13
-
Sweet Pea(Read more)38
Latest Classifieds
- Work permit as Online Investor (Personal Investor)
- House for sale - Mt Pleasant WB
- \'09 Honda Fit 4sale
- New Blackberry Q10 Gold Plated and Gold Porsche Design (24 HRS BBM Chat:295941E1)
- Town - Extra Large Bedroom with XL Walk-in Closet
- ONE BEDROOM SHARING $325.00
- CINSA RElays
- Retirement plan
- Make Money Now - Easy as ever
- Stainless Steel Electric Stove & Electric Water Heater for SALE
Comment Policy
The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of CNS or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by CNS. Read more
Recent Comments
- 21:15: Rubbish!! CEO of
4 hours 51 sec ago - Well according to her bio she
4 hours 1 min ago - Conyers Dill & Pearman's
4 hours 4 min ago - I'd rather a by election than
4 hours 7 min ago - With an address in the US
4 hours 17 min ago - So I see they have taken all
4 hours 22 min ago - Any insurance or necessity
4 hours 23 min ago - What a fantastic reply. Thank
4 hours 29 min ago - What we CAN tell you is that
4 hours 30 min ago - I bet this is one occasion
4 hours 31 min ago
Search




Comments
look at this.....
http://caymannewsservice.com/sites/default/files/Single%20v%20Multi%20Member%20Constituencies%20Address%2012-4-12%20(1).pdf
Section 89 of the
Section 89 of the Constitution provides that the boundaries of electoral districts shall:
(a) take no account of the racial distribution of electors within the Cayman Islands;
(b) take into account the natural boundaries within the Cayman Islands;
(c) have regard to existing electoral districts; and
(d) subject to the foregoing provisions of this subsection, ensure that—
(i) so far as reasonably practicable, across all electoral districts there will be an equal
ratio between the number of elected members of the Legislative Assembly
representing each electoral district and the number of persons qualified to be
registered as electors under section 90 in that district; but
(ii) Cayman Brac and Little Cayman shall (between these two islands) at all times return
at least two members to the Legislative Assembly.
Notice that the equal ratio is only "so far as reasonably practicable" and is subject to the other considerations. Based on those criteria the Electoral Boundaries Commission have drawn boundaries in the event we select single member constituencies so that EE and NS will continue to be electoral districts. You will note that CB and LC are indeed guaranteed at least two MLAs. This is due to their remoteness from the seat of government and they are, after all more than a mere district but are two-thirds of the three Cayman Islands.
EE and NS each have almost 600 voters. The average number of voters per MLA is 834, i.e. they have some 28% less voters than the average. Similarly, CB/LC has almost 1000 voters and will return two MLAs. On the other side of the coin using only the number of voters GT would actually be entitled to 7 MLAs. Clearly this would create a gross imbalance in favour of GT which would control more than 1/3 of the membership of the LA.
In other democratic countries the number of voters in each single member constituency does vary, sometimes considerably. That is true in the U.S., the U.K. and throughout the British Commonwealth. For example, the UK Parliamentary constituency of Aberconwy in Wales has 45,000 voters while the constituency of Bury St. Edmunds in England has 86,000 voters - a 91% difference.See Wikipedia UK Parliament constituencies.
In no country is there an absolute rule that there must in every case be an exact (or even approximate) number of voters in each constituency regardless of any other consideration although that is always an important factor. Obviously even if we were to establish an exact number of voters per district that distribution of voters could easily change by the next election. Clearly, it would impractical to have re-districting for every election and to that extent there would always be some variation.
So under section (b) can some
So under section (b) can some one explain the piece of water between the Brac and Little Cayman?
So the answer is that the
So the answer is that the existing district lines can indeed be crossed to better even out the electorate among the MLA districts if that is reasonably practicable. After a few elections, no one will care about the old districts since they will have no real political meaning. Your MLA district will be the important thing. Next question, does the constitution say how often the MLA districts have to be redrawn. Ought to do it every census like the US.
You seem to be missing the
You seem to be missing the impact of (c) which has priority over equal ratio of voters to MLAs.
The Constitution does not say. Every 10 years is the norm.
You can interpret (c) how you
You can interpret (c) how you like, but there is a perfectly good argument that "having regard to" the current boundary means little more than keeping it in mind as one of the factors to be considered in the process of setting the districts up as equally as practicable. Once single member districts are the norm it will be interesting to see Cayman learn about the sport of political redistricting every so often. At that point the ins will be drawing lines based on known voting patterns and will move the boundaries to maximize their electorates' voting power. It's like watching sausage being made.
That interpretation is not as
That interpretation is not as subjective as you think. "Subject to the foregoing provisions of this subsection..." means that above factors, which includes having regard to existing district boundaries, have priority over the equal ratio of voters to MLAs (which follows).
"At that point the ins will be drawing lines based on known voting patterns and will move the boundaries to maximize their electorates' voting power".
That is known as gerrymandering and is not permitted.
Post new comment