Public should be concerned
(CNS): The auditor general has said that the public needs to be concerned about how government is spending and managing public money. Following the release of another report highlighting continued weaknesses in how government looks after the public purse, Alastair Swarbrick said government has a duty to have proper stewardship over public finances and the people need to pay attention to how their money is being managed. Ahead of several more reports expected over the next two months, the auditor general encouraged the public to pay close attention to how its money was being looked after.
“I think the public should be concerned about these issues. It is their money at the end of the day, however it is collected and whatever coercive revenues it is incurred through,” Swarbrick said Tuesday, as he published his latest report revealing continued risks of abuse of the government’s fuel card system GASBOY.
“They should be looking for the government to get as much value as possible from that money,” the auditor general said, referring to public coffers. “It should be directed at appropriate things, the right things and not used for inappropriate activities. It should be of very significant concern to the public if there is a risk of potential abuse of the system.”
Swarbrick said his reports were not about “picking on” or “harassing” government but it was his job to hold government to account for its use of public funds.
“We want to help government move forward and improve but at the end of the day my ultimate goal is to hold them to account to the Legislative Assembly and there unto the public. The government has a responsibility to have effective proper stewardship of those funds. It is public money, not their money, and they have the responsibility to use that money appropriately in line with good principles."
He said that it was the controls in place that would prevent the system from being abused. A common theme in most of Swarbrick’s and his predecessor’s reports is the failure of leadership in government to oversee and control systems relating to how money is spent.
The audit office is one of the few checks and balances on how government spends the half billion dollars it collects from the people each year but Swarbrick also pointed to the work of the internal audit unit.
This department also examines weaknesses and vulnerability to fraud, abuse or mismanagement in public spending, which he said should be utilised by public service management. He said the unit’s findings were a useful tool to identify potential weaknesses and point to ways things could be improved, but government is not making good use of that tool.
The internal audit unit does not regularly publish its audits, though it has released some under Freedom of information requests. Their work often only comes to light as a result of the auditor general taking up the unit's findings.
With serious weaknesses and potential fraud and abuse by government being revealed in the last three reports, the next report on how government deals with capital projects is also likely to reveal further failings.
Swarbrick said that in the next report due at the end of this month his office has used the school projects and the new government building as case studies to measure how well government deals with major public sector developments.
Following that the office will be releasing the first two of four reports examining government spending in general which will examine more closely what are believed to be widespread weaknesses and vulnerabilities across the entire public sector.
The auditor is also hoping to publish an update on public sector financial reporting and details on where government is on the promised consolidated accounts for the 2010/11 financial year.
Viewpoints
-
Nicky Watson(Read more)21
-
101(Read more)21
Latest Classifieds
- For Sale: Apple Iphone 5 32Gb And Samsung Galaxy S4
- Scholarship Fundraiser
- Great Priced North Coast Sandy Beach Lot for Sale
- Original brand new apple iphone 5 64gb,32gb,16gb,Samsung Galaxy S3,S4
- Beautiful Cayaman Style Home
- for sale: samsung galaxy s4, apple iphone 5
- 2004 HONDA FIT
- 2004 HONDA FIT
- Walkers Rd condo for Rent - Poincianas
- Pups for sale
Comment Policy
The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of CNS or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by CNS. Read more
Recent Comments
- Will she need her driverPaul
1 hour 31 min ago - Please, please , please,
1 hour 32 min ago - Tara is a brilliant West
1 hour 40 min ago - Alot of us wanted Roy for our
1 hour 49 min ago - Tara seems to be a lady to
1 hour 58 min ago - According to the press
2 hours 4 min ago - Alden, I am not your
2 hours 15 min ago - Alden, I am very concern that
2 hours 15 min ago - Excellent question, I too as
2 hours 21 min ago - No ship jumping required I
2 hours 27 min ago
Search





Comments
Yes but our churches are rich
Yes but our churches are rich with well-paid preahers while our colleges are 3rd world.
Who says the preachers are
we have always had a culture
we have always had a culture of piratism in Cayman which is still alive and well today. This is no worse than the Caymanian employers that steal from their employees pension and health and pocket the money contributed by their employees (and btw I am Caymanian)! And when they get caught by the pension office, they get the opportunity to pay it back on a lay-away plan!! WTF?!!! They should go straight to jail! It is theft pure and simple. But the same happens with social services and the vast number of persons that collect money from our treasury (millions per year) who dont ever intend to work and when Christmas comes they call social services to find out if they will collect a bonus!! This is real stuff folks. Government overides the decision of the social workers and orders them to pay out to persons who should NOT be collecting money. The social workers are incensed as they see where the real need is and some of the persons they are paying out to assist clearly have means. Remember Cayman airways and the vast number of persons who travelled for free many, many years after they were no longer employed with Cayman airways! well guess what, somebody had to pay for that!! US! We should be concerned, but the Governments of the day dont have the political will to do the right thing. When the money was flowing they didnt have to. Well now we are broke! Government doesnt have the money to throw into the hole. The silver lining is we as a country will be forced to address the problem. It will be interesting to see those who have benefited from the free illegal gas. Would not be surprised if they are persons in position of authority who should know better, but if it was free for the taking and they were all doing it - well why not them too!
Maybe we should fire the UDP,
Maybe we should fire the UDP, Cayman? Has anyone thought of that? Oh and maybe we can revoke at least one of the premiers pensions while we're at it?
I am a single parent of a
PR fees are illegal as they
PR fees are illegal as they are discrimination of settled residents on the basis of national origin. In your case it is also a breach of your right to a family life.
Write to the FS, saying they are illegal and ask for them to be waived.
When he breaks the law and says "No", pay the fees but state you are doing so under compulsion and objection.
Find a civilsed attorney to take your case. There are recent cases which stress that the Courts must apply the applicable rights law when exercising powers.
Your mistreatment is a disgrace in a modern nation that purports to comply with human rights. Sadly the culture of fear and the arbitrary behaviour of boards are designed to prevent people asserting their rights
Has nothing to do with
Has nothing to do with national origin. It is because you don't hold Caymanian status. It is perfectly lawful to discriminate on the basis of citizenship.
whats the point of being
whats the point of being concerned when the most educated hardworking members of society cannot even vote?
Remember first that citizens
Remember first that citizens of Cayman have to vote for a Caymanian politician only. Would you want that?
You should be concerned
You should be concerned because they have spent all their own money and now they want more of yours. but only what they are intitled to.
Self-righteous, jealous and
Don't forget the right of
Don't forget the right of free gas. If non citizens get free gas it defeats the purpose.
Nah, many nations let
Nah, many nations let non-citizens vote, and a bar on the right to vote and stand in elections for those who have been resident for over 10 years is almost certainly a breach of the ECHR.
The democratic standard
The democratic standard across the world is that citizens have the right to vote. If particular countries wish to give that right to non-citizens that is a matter for them but it does not suddenly create a universal human right so that non-citizens have the right to vote in every other country.
Unless you are you are a British Citizen, Commonwealth Citizen or Irish Citizen you will not have the right to vote in the UK whether you have been resident there for 10 years or not.
There is no case coming out of the ECHR to support your position.
Commonwealth citizens do not
Commonwealth citizens do not have the right to vote in any UK elections unless they become UK residents and fulfill the requirements thereof. And the Irish, are you serious? ONLY UK CITIZENS CAN VOTE IN THE UK !!!! How difficult is that to understand?
Is there no end to the
IF RESIDENT, now you're
IF RESIDENT, now you're getting it. That makes them UK residents as explained above. Citizens, citizenship and residents are all different animals. Anyone can be a citizen, only citizenship confers the legal definition and residents must be registered and living in the country on a long term basis.
You guys have been on this rock too long where these lines are deliberately blurred and used in different contexts. Read a dictionary and stop trying to be so superior.
I have never said or
From the UK Electoral
From the UK Electoral Commission:
Who can register to vote?You can register to vote if you are:
If you are 16 or 17, you can only register if you will be 18 within the lifetime of the electoral register. You cannot vote until you are 18.
Below is a full list of Commonwealth and European Union countries. If you are a citizen of one of these countries, and resident in the UK, you are eligible to register to vote in UK elections. To qualify, Commonwealth citizens must be resident in the UK and either have leave to remain in the UK or not require such leave. The definition of a 'Commonwealth citizen' includes citizens of British Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories.
Citizens of the European Union (who are not Commonwealth citizens or Citizens of the Republic of Ireland) can vote in European and local elections in the UK, but are not able to vote in UK Parliamentary general elections or referendums.
Now how difficult is that for you to understand? You must be a registered UK resident to vote in the UK, regardless of if you are an Irish or Commonwealth citizen. So you see, it is not a free for all as originally suggested, Irish nationals still have to become UK residents.
You are completely correct
Contradict how? It is very
Contradict how? It is very clear and unambiguous and as a former immigration officer I can be sure of this.
Irish citizens, as defined by the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs, cannot vote in UK elections as they are effectively a foreign national, despite being an EU subject. Citizens of Northern Ireland, (of which the Eire Govt like to think of as part of their country) can vote as they are UK citizens/residents. As for the Commonwealth stupid, they have limited rights to enter the UK and perhaps apply for full UK residency, but they cannot vote unless they do so. Exactly the same would apply to any Irish national if they became a full resident of the UK.
So you understand in simple terms, YOU MUST HOLD FULL UK CITIZENSHIP TO VOTE IN UK ELECTIONS. SOUTHERN IRELAND IRELAND IS NOT PART OF THE UK AND CITIZENS OR EIRE DO NOT HOLD UK PASSPORTS!!!! Stop spouting nationalist crap and acknowledge that the north exists as a seperate country within the UK not Eire.
OOps, sorry, I meant
OOps, sorry, I meant immigration offender. Still, makes you feel good anyway.
Now you have gone off on a
You appear to think I'm the
You appear to think I'm the same person, anonymous is not a name you know.
You mean there is more than
Being an immigration officer
You superior wally's are so
You superior wally's are so easy to get a rise out of. Lighten up, have a beer.
Read back oh great oricale, you'll see that it has been written by me and others that we get the citizen thing. You don't get the resident thing or that they must be a registered UK RESIDENT to vote, regardless of origin. All the best, Santa Claus, (registered UK resident, c/o Harrods, London) HA !!
You've got to brush up on the
Long term UK residency first,
Long term UK residency first, Irish or Commonwealth citizenship second.
Irish citizens cannot vote in
Irish citizens cannot vote in the UK, only UK citizens can participate in UK elections. Northern Irelands citizens are the only citizens from the island of Ireland entitled to vote under UK citizenship rules.
Unless they are full
Unless they are full residents and registered as such within the rules. Therefore making them UK residents. Easy.
Unless you are you are
Unless you are you are a British Citizen, Commonwealth Citizen or Irish Citizen
There are around 2.1 bilion Commonwealth citizens in the world, so that is a lot of people entitled to vote in the UK. That is like opening up the vote in Cayman to close to 1 miilion people if they were residents
Obviously the can only vote
You mean a Northern Irish
You mean a Northern Irish citizen, Ireland or Eire is not part of the UK. Perhaps UK citizens should reclaim their right to self determination and withdraw all non British resident passports and entitlements. Why should Caymanians, Jamaicans, Indians etc, etc....... continue to hold passports of a country they do not reside in or pay anything towards?
We were conferred British
Actually, you were confirmed
Actually, you were confirmed as British Overseas Citizens, not British Citizens and this was derived from the original British Dependant Territories Act that was renamed the British Overseas Territories Act in 2002. The two acts are identical in all but name.
The term BOC is considered a useless and somewhat irrelevant citizenship as it does not automatically allow residence or rights to work in the UK. It most certainly doesn't allow a BOC to vote in UK elections unless the BOC is also a UK resident. It is true that there are a few minor perks to BOC, but they are largely piecemeal in content or substance.
Are you really that clueless
It seems anyone can be a
It seems anyone can be a British citizen, its being a British resident that counts in UK parlimentary elections. And that applies to all, including the Irish, Commonwealth or BOC's. All the rest is just legal garbage for lawyers to sound important with, it doesn't count for sqaut in reality.
It sounds as if you are
Obviously the lines are a
Obviously the lines are a little blurred now. Whilst you are quite right that the BOC is derived from the BNA, (my mistake, sorry) the fact remains that despite all of this nonsense a BOC does not have the right to have immediate access to parliamentary elections in the UK. No more than any one else that is noted as 'being able to vote' until they have been a long term resident of the UK and registerd as such on the electoral role. It is ridiculous to infer without qualification that an individual, whatever his status, can just enter the UK and vote. That is most definately not the case and no where does it say he can, not even in the BOTA, BNA or the EU.
Regardless of status, he must be a UK resident as defined by law, not by ridiculous sweeping statements that only confuse the issue.
It seems that you have
No, but like every other
No, but like every other present/former colony or territory you sure make the most of it when it suits you. Left wing, guilt ridden MP's have given away our right to self determination, that's why they're not in government anymore.
You still can't vote though,
You still can't vote though, no more than a UK resident can vote in Cayman. More's the pity.
Dual passports of
Dual passports of convenience?
Many people of various
Read etc, etc........ Not
Read etc, etc........ Not just Jamaicans and Indians then is it?
No, I mean Irish citizens.
Amazing the number of Brits
Doh!!! you've successfully
Doh!!! you've successfully cancelled out your own argument. As you have just said, Northern Irelands citizens are also UK citizens, they are definately NOT Irish citizens so therefore cannot vote in a UK election as you previously stated. Oh yes, Commonwealth country's can't vote either as they are not UK residents, nationals or citizens for the purposes of national elections. Come on, do keep up.
They can be Irish citizens if
They can be Irish citizens if they choose to be.
Post new comment