RegalRealty-Poinciana-Banner-V1.gif

Public should be concerned

swarbrick.jpg(CNS): The auditor general has said that the public needs to be concerned about how government is spending and managing public money. Following the release of another report highlighting continued weaknesses in how government looks after the public purse, Alastair Swarbrick said government has a duty to have proper stewardship over public finances and the people need to pay attention to how their money is being managed. Ahead of several more reports expected over the next two months, the auditor general encouraged the public to pay close attention to how its money was being looked after.

“I think the public should be concerned about these issues. It is their money at the end of the day, however it is collected and whatever coercive revenues it is incurred through,” Swarbrick said Tuesday, as he published his latest report revealing continued risks of abuse of the government’s fuel card system GASBOY.

“They should be looking for the government to get as much value as possible from that money,” the auditor general said, referring to public coffers. “It should be directed at appropriate things, the right things and not used for inappropriate activities. It should be of very significant concern to the public if there is a risk of potential abuse of the system.”

Swarbrick said his reports were not about “picking on” or “harassing” government but it was his job to hold government to account for its use of public funds.

“We want to help government move forward and improve but at the end of the day my ultimate goal is to hold them to account to the Legislative Assembly and there unto the public. The government has a responsibility to have effective proper stewardship of those funds. It is public money, not their money, and they have the responsibility to use that money appropriately in line with good principles."

He said that it was the controls in place that would prevent the system from being abused. A common theme in most of Swarbrick’s and his predecessor’s reports is the failure of leadership in government to oversee and control systems relating to how money is spent.

The audit office is one of the few checks and balances on how government spends the half billion dollars it collects from the people each year but Swarbrick also pointed to the work of the internal audit unit.

This department also examines weaknesses and vulnerability to fraud, abuse or mismanagement in public spending, which he said should be utilised by public service management. He said the unit’s findings were a useful tool to identify potential weaknesses and point to ways things could be improved, but government is not making good use of that tool.

The internal audit unit does not regularly publish its audits, though it has released some under Freedom of information requests. Their work often only comes to light as a result of the auditor general taking up the unit's findings.

With serious weaknesses and potential fraud and abuse by government being revealed in the last three reports, the next report on how government deals with capital projects is also likely to reveal further failings.

Swarbrick said that in the next report due at the end of this month his office has used the school projects and the new government building as case studies to measure how well government deals with major public sector developments.

Following that the office will be releasing the first two of four reports examining government spending in general which will examine more closely what are believed to be widespread weaknesses and vulnerabilities across the entire public sector. 

The auditor is also hoping to publish an update on public sector financial reporting and details on where government is on the promised consolidated accounts for the 2010/11 financial year.

Comments

Yes but our churches are rich

Yes but our churches are rich with well-paid preahers while our colleges are 3rd world.

7
3
0
Troll
1
LOL

Who says the preachers are

Who says the preachers are well paid?
4
1
0
Troll
0
LOL

we have always had a culture

we have always had a culture of piratism in Cayman which is still alive and well today. This is no worse than the Caymanian employers that steal from their employees pension and health and pocket the money contributed by their employees (and btw I am Caymanian)! And when they get caught by the pension office, they get the opportunity to pay it back on a lay-away plan!!  WTF?!!!  They should go straight to jail!  It is theft pure and simple.  But the same happens with social services and the vast number of persons that collect money from our treasury (millions per year) who dont ever intend to work and when Christmas comes they call social services to find out if they will collect a bonus!! This is real stuff folks.  Government overides the decision of the social workers and orders them to pay out to persons who should NOT be collecting money.  The social workers are incensed as they see where the real need is and some of the persons they are paying out to assist clearly have means. Remember Cayman airways and the vast number of persons who travelled for free many, many years after they were no longer employed with Cayman airways!  well guess what, somebody had to pay for that!! US! We should be concerned, but the Governments of the day dont have the political will to do the right thing. When the money was flowing they didnt have to. Well now we are broke! Government doesnt have the money to throw into the hole. The silver lining is we as a country will be forced to address the problem.  It will be interesting to see those who have benefited from the free illegal gas.  Would not be surprised if they are persons in position of authority who should know better, but if it was free for the taking and they were all doing it - well why not them too!  

15
1
0
Troll
0
LOL

Maybe we should fire the UDP,

Maybe we should fire the UDP, Cayman? Has anyone thought of that? Oh and maybe we can revoke at least one of the premiers pensions while we're at it?

43
0
0
Troll
2
LOL

I am a single parent of a

I am a single parent of a Caymanian child. I earn less then 40 k per year. But govt. Has raised my PR fees to $8,000?! All the while WASTING as many dollars as they can. This is sick! I can 't keep lights on, but they flagrantly waste money and live the high life off the backs of our children? Hope they all rot in hell.
50
3
0
Troll
0
LOL

PR fees are illegal as they

PR fees are illegal as they are discrimination of settled residents on the basis of national origin.  In your case it is also a breach of your right to a family life.

Write to the FS, saying they are illegal and ask for them to be waived.

When he breaks the law and says "No", pay the fees but state you are doing so under compulsion and objection.

Find a civilsed attorney to take your case.  There are recent cases which stress that the Courts must apply the applicable rights law when exercising powers.

Your mistreatment is a disgrace in a modern nation that purports to comply with human rights.  Sadly the culture of fear and the arbitrary behaviour of boards are designed to prevent people asserting their rights

13
10
0
Troll
0
LOL

Has nothing to do with

Has nothing to do with national origin. It is because you don't hold Caymanian status. It is perfectly lawful to discriminate on the basis of citizenship.

8
0
0
Troll
2
LOL

whats the point of being

whats the point of being concerned when the most educated hardworking members of society cannot even vote?

23
22
0
Troll
1
LOL

Remember first that citizens

Remember first that citizens of Cayman have to vote for a Caymanian politician only.  Would you want that?

1
3
0
Troll
0
LOL

You should be concerned

You should be concerned  because  they have spent all their own money and now they want more of yours.  but only what they are intitled to.

2
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Self-righteous, jealous and

Self-righteous, jealous and probably misguided. As in every country around the world citizens get to exercise their democratic right in their country; and rightfully so. It could be successfully argued that voting rights conferred onto the transient populations of any country would be an infringement on the rights of its citizens to determine their own path.
13
5
0
Troll
4
LOL

Don't forget the right of

Don't forget the right of free gas.  If non citizens get free gas it defeats the purpose.

3
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Nah, many nations let

Nah, many nations let non-citizens vote, and a bar on the right to vote and stand in elections for those who have been resident for over 10 years is almost certainly a breach of the ECHR.

13
8
0
Troll
0
LOL

The democratic standard

The democratic standard across the world is that citizens have the right to vote. If particular countries wish to give that right to non-citizens that is a matter for them but it does not suddenly create a universal human right so that non-citizens have the right to vote in every other country.

Unless you are you are a British Citizen, Commonwealth Citizen or Irish Citizen you will not have the right to vote in the UK whether you have been resident there for 10 years or not.

There is no case coming out of the ECHR to support your position.    

6
5
0
Troll
0
LOL

Commonwealth citizens do not

Commonwealth citizens do not have the right to vote in any UK elections unless they become UK residents and fulfill the requirements thereof. And the Irish, are you serious? ONLY UK CITIZENS CAN VOTE IN THE UK !!!! How difficult is that to understand?

2
8
0
Troll
0
LOL

Is there no end to the

Is there no end to the ignorance on this issue? You do not even realize that you have contradicted yourself . First you correctly say that Commonwealth citizens can vote in the UK if resident and then promptly deny that by saying only UK citizens can vote in the UK. There is absolutely no doubt about Irish Citizens being able to vote if resident in the UK. Read the law and stop making an ass of yourself.
8
2
0
Troll
0
LOL

IF RESIDENT, now you're

IF RESIDENT, now you're getting it. That makes them UK residents as explained above. Citizens, citizenship and residents are all different animals. Anyone can be a citizen, only citizenship confers the legal definition and residents must be registered and living in the country on a long term basis.

You guys have been on this rock too long where these lines are deliberately blurred and used in different contexts. Read a dictionary and stop trying to be so superior.

2
6
0
Troll
0
LOL

I have never said or

I have never said or suggested anything different. The context of my original comments was whethe non-citizens who are resident in a country for at least 10 years have a right to vote in that country's national elections. My answer was regardless of length of residence you would not be entitled to vote unless you were a Brutish Citizen, Commonwealth citizen or Irish Citizen you will not be allowed to vote in UK national elections. How that could be twisted to mean that Irish citizens and Commonwealth citizens who are not resident in the UK can vote in UK elections is beyond me. Well, at least you finally got the point.
6
2
0
Troll
0
LOL

From the UK Electoral

From the UK Electoral Commission:

 

Who can register to vote?

You can register to vote if you are:

  • 16 years old or over and a British citizen or an Irish, qualifying Commonwealth or European Union citizen who is resident in the UK

If you are 16 or 17, you can only register if you will be 18 within the lifetime of the electoral register. You cannot vote until you are 18.

Below is a full list of Commonwealth and European Union countries. If you are a citizen of one of these countries, and resident in the UK, you are eligible to register to vote in UK elections. To qualify, Commonwealth citizens must be resident in the UK and either have leave to remain in the UK or not require such leave. The definition of a 'Commonwealth citizen' includes citizens of British Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories.

Citizens of the European Union (who are not Commonwealth citizens or Citizens of the Republic of Ireland) can vote in European and local elections in the UK, but are not able to vote in UK Parliamentary general elections or referendums.

Now how difficult is that for you to understand? You must be a registered UK resident to vote in the UK, regardless of if you are an Irish or Commonwealth citizen. So you see, it is not a free for all as originally suggested, Irish nationals still have to become UK residents.

3
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

You are completely correct

You are completely correct except that it was never suggested by me that one did not have to be resident in the UK in order to vote in UK elections. The context of all of this whether long time residents of a country who are not citizens should have the right to vote. If you thought otherwise you missed the whole thread and read the comments out of context.
6
0
0
Troll
2
LOL

Contradict how? It is very

Contradict how? It is very clear and unambiguous and as a former immigration officer I can be sure of this.

Irish citizens, as defined by the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs, cannot vote in UK elections as they are effectively a foreign national, despite being an EU subject. Citizens of Northern Ireland, (of which the Eire Govt like to think of as part of their country) can vote as they are UK citizens/residents. As for the Commonwealth stupid, they have limited rights to enter the UK and perhaps apply for full UK residency, but they cannot vote unless they do so. Exactly the same would apply to any Irish national if they became a full resident of the UK.

So you understand in simple terms, YOU MUST HOLD FULL UK CITIZENSHIP TO VOTE IN UK ELECTIONS. SOUTHERN IRELAND IRELAND IS NOT PART OF THE UK AND CITIZENS OR EIRE DO NOT HOLD UK PASSPORTS!!!!  Stop spouting nationalist crap and acknowledge that the north exists as a seperate country within the UK not Eire.

2
4
0
Troll
0
LOL

OOps, sorry, I meant

OOps, sorry, I meant immigration offender. Still, makes you feel good anyway.

0
0
0
Troll
3
LOL

Now you have gone off on a

Now you have gone off on a complete that has nothing to do with the original issue.
5
0
0
Troll
2
LOL

You appear to think I'm the

You appear to think I'm the same person, anonymous is not a name you know.

1
2
0
Troll
2
LOL

You mean there is more than

You mean there is more than one of you typing in block capitals with multiple exclamation marks and making erroneous points?
4
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Being an immigration officer

Being an immigration officer does not make you an authority on who is entitled to vote in a country. I am going to make this short in the hope that it will make it easier to grasp. Provided one is resident in the UK one can vote in UK national elections if one is a Commonwealth citizen or Citizen of the Republic of Ireland. One does NOT have to be a UK citizen to vote in UK national elections. If you still cannot understand this then I will leave you to wallow in your own ignorance.
4
2
0
Troll
0
LOL

You superior wally's are so

You superior wally's are so easy to get a rise out of. Lighten up, have a beer.

Read back oh great oricale, you'll see that it has been written by me and others that we get the citizen thing. You don't get the resident thing or that they must be a registered UK RESIDENT to vote, regardless of origin. All the best, Santa Claus, (registered UK resident, c/o Harrods, London) HA !! 

0
3
0
Troll
1
LOL

You've got to brush up on the

You've got to brush up on the reading comprehension skills along with the spelling. You are sorely lacking in both.
4
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Long term UK residency first,

Long term UK residency first, Irish or Commonwealth citizenship second.

6
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Irish citizens cannot vote in

Irish citizens cannot vote in the UK, only UK citizens can participate in UK elections. Northern Irelands citizens are the only citizens from the island of Ireland entitled to vote under UK citizenship rules.

2
5
0
Troll
0
LOL

Unless they are full

Unless they are full residents and registered as such within the rules. Therefore making them UK residents. Easy.

4
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Unless you are you are

Unless you are you are a British Citizen, Commonwealth Citizen or Irish Citizen

There are around 2.1 bilion Commonwealth citizens in the world, so that is a lot of people entitled to vote in the UK.  That is like opening up the vote in Cayman to close to 1 miilion people if they were residents

6
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Obviously the can only vote

Obviously the can only vote if resident in the UK.
8
1
0
Troll
0
LOL

You mean a Northern Irish

You mean a Northern Irish citizen, Ireland or Eire is not part of the UK. Perhaps UK citizens should reclaim their right to self determination and withdraw all non British resident passports and entitlements. Why should Caymanians, Jamaicans, Indians etc, etc....... continue to hold passports of a country they do not reside in or pay anything towards?

4
4
0
Troll
0
LOL

We were conferred British

We were conferred British Citizenship by the UK Overseas Territories Act 2002. We did not request it. Take that up with your UK politicians. I'm not sure what you mean by Indians and Jamaicans continuing to hold British passports.
7
4
0
Troll
0
LOL

Actually, you were confirmed

Actually, you were confirmed as British Overseas Citizens, not British Citizens and this was derived from the original British Dependant Territories Act that was renamed the British Overseas Territories Act in 2002. The two acts are identical in all but name.

The term BOC is considered a useless and somewhat irrelevant citizenship as it does not automatically allow residence or rights to work in the UK. It most certainly doesn't allow a BOC to vote in UK elections unless the BOC is also a UK resident. It is true that there are a few minor perks to BOC, but they are largely piecemeal in content or substance.

3
6
0
Troll
0
LOL

Are you really that clueless

Are you really that clueless or are you pulling my leg? There was never any Act called the British Dependent Territories Act. British Dependent Territories were so named by the British Nationality Act 1981. It is correct that they were renamed British Overseas Territories by the Overseas Territories Act but far more importantly section 3 of the Act provides that "Any person who, immediately before the commencement of this section, is a British overseas territories citizen shall, on the commencement of this section, become a British citizen.". Is that clear enough for you?
9
2
0
Troll
0
LOL

It seems anyone can be a

It seems anyone can be a British citizen, its being a British resident that counts in UK parlimentary elections. And that applies to all, including the Irish, Commonwealth or BOC's. All the rest is just legal garbage for lawyers to sound important with, it doesn't count for sqaut in reality.

2
5
0
Troll
0
LOL

It sounds as if you are

It sounds as if you are finally coming around albeit slowly. Obviously one must be resident in the UK AND have one of those citizenships in order to vote, the latter being the point at issue.
6
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

Obviously the lines are a

Obviously the lines are a little blurred now. Whilst you are quite right that the BOC is derived from the BNA, (my mistake, sorry) the fact remains that despite all of this nonsense a BOC does not have the right to have immediate access to parliamentary elections in the UK. No more than any one else that is noted as 'being able to vote' until they have been a long term resident of the UK and registerd as such on the electoral role. It is ridiculous to infer without qualification that an individual, whatever his status, can just enter the UK and vote. That is most definately not the case and no where does it say he can, not even in the BOTA, BNA or the EU.

Regardless of status, he must be a UK resident as defined by law, not by ridiculous sweeping statements that only confuse the issue.

2
4
0
Troll
0
LOL

It seems that you have

It seems that you have finally accepted that BOTCs were conferred British Citizenship in the OTA. You are making progress. There was never any suggestion that one did not have to be resident in the UK in order to vote. The only point at issue was the citizens of which countries,being resident in the UK, are entitled to vote in the UK.
6
0
0
Troll
1
LOL

No, but like every other

No, but like every other present/former colony or territory you sure make the most of it when it suits you. Left wing, guilt ridden MP's have given away our right to self determination, that's why they're not in government anymore.

4
6
0
Troll
0
LOL

You still can't vote though,

You still can't vote though, no more than a UK resident can vote in Cayman. More's the pity.

5
1
0
Troll
1
LOL

Dual passports of

Dual passports of convenience?

5
0
0
Troll
0
LOL

Many people of various

Many people of various nationalities hold dual nationalities. Why pick on the Jamaicans and Indians.
5
1
0
Troll
1
LOL

Read etc, etc........ Not

Read etc, etc........ Not just Jamaicans and Indians then is it?

0
2
0
Troll
0
LOL

No, I mean Irish citizens.

No, I mean Irish citizens. There is no such thing as a Northern Irish citizen for the reason that, as you say, Northern Ireland is a part of the UK.
3
3
0
Troll
0
LOL

Amazing the number of Brits

Amazing the number of Brits on here that clearly do not understand the extent of the franchise in their own country. Please read up on the Representation of the People Act 1983 as amended which will show that Commonwealth Citizens an citizens of the Republic of Ireland can vote in UK elections if they are resident in the UK. In any event the contention that Irish citizens cannot vote in the UK regardless of length of residency reinforces my original point.
5
3
0
Troll
1
LOL

Doh!!! you've successfully

Doh!!! you've successfully cancelled out your own argument. As you have just said, Northern Irelands citizens are also UK citizens, they are definately NOT Irish citizens so therefore cannot vote in a UK election as you previously stated. Oh yes, Commonwealth country's can't vote either as they are not UK residents, nationals or citizens for the purposes of national elections. Come on, do keep up. 

3
5
0
Troll
1
LOL

They can be Irish citizens if

They can be Irish citizens if they choose to be.  

0
0
0
Troll
2
LOL

Post new comment

You must be logged in if you are using your real name
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Note: the editor toolbar is avaible to registered users.
Read the CNS comment policy
Become a registered user
Login
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.